OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63494379

OK, danke für die Rückmeldung.

63326741

OK, I fixed various errors here:
changeset/63533472
I think you probably forgot to download existing data before adding new. This resulted in duplicated or overlapping ways. Hope I did not introduce new errors with my changes...

63320002

Hmm, are you sure that normal traffic like cars can use this way? In ESRI I see some marks which indicate that pedestrian use this way but I see no normal infrastructure to cross a rail. Besides that the connecting nodes should be either railway=crossing or level_crossing, depending on the road type.

63555202

Thanks and happy mapping!

51086833

Moin! Mir sind hier ein paar building:demolished=residential aufgefallen. Normalerweise verwendet man z.B. razed:building=residential
Der "Lifecycle Prefix" ist halt ein Prefix, kein Suffix ;-)
osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Bei den Straßen ist highway=demolished auch unklar, könnte auch sowas wie "voller Schlaglöcher" bedeuten.

43191618

Hi! You changed / added some ways to highway=demolished here. It is a good idea to keep those ways because Mapbox still shows them, but I think this tag is a bit unclear, it might be missunderstood as "bad surface". I've changed them to razed:highway=* here:
changeset/63579566
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

59322289

Moin!
Mir sind ein paar Wege mit dem unüblichen tag highway=demolished aufgefallen, z.B, hier:
way/224209238
Ist etwas unklar, könnte auch als "voller Schlaglöcher" oder so verstanden werden. Schau mal bitte, ob Du hier einen passenden Prefix findest:
osm.wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

49836893

I found a few ways with the unusual tag highway=demolished. I think this tag is unclear, it might be missunderstood as something like "bad surface". Please try to find a proper lifecycle prefix for them. See
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

38321186

There is also a highway=demolished next to it. I think this tag is unclear, it might be missunderstood as something like "bad surface". Please try to find a proper lifecycle prefix for this and other roads with this tag created / modifed by you.

38321186

Hi!
If I got that right Bing is quite up to date here and it shows some roads and many new buildings in this area. I don't think this road is in status construction, rather razed:highway=residential.

58994725

Hi MikeN!
I found a few ways with the unusual tag highway=demolished. This may also mean something like "bad surface" . Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead so that the status is clearer.
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

59256038

Hi!
The tagging of the bridge is quite confusing:
way/459628736
How can it be both a bridge=yes and a demolished:bridge=yes? You also added highway_1=proposed. Does that mean the status is that it once was a bridge and now it is proposed to rebuild it?

42785544

Hi! Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead of the unusual highway=demolished for
way/432979568 and
way/444346202
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

56278202

Hi! Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead of the unusual highway=demolished for
way/15424105
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

56761550

Hi! I wonder if highway=underwater_way
could be replaced by abandoned:highway=track
or destroyed:highway=track?

63264688

Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=other. Please don't invent new road types! I see that you try to map road areas here.
Why do you add area=yes to ways with area:highway=*?
When you change a highway from tertiary to secondary please remember to change the corresponding area:highway ways as well, see e.g. way/575222925

63401862

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have mapped lots of buildings here, that is good :-)
One small problem: You typically draw the shapes of the buildings too large, so that the shapes also cross roads. Please try to avoid that, the shape should describe the outline of the building at the ground
so that one can draw highways without crossing the buildings.
Happy mapping!

63555202

Hi!
Please don't invent new _link types for minor roads. The tag highway=unclassified_link is only used here.

63535371

Hi! You used highway=unclassifay instead
of highway=unclassified on 13 ways,
e.g. this one:
way/634143784
Please correct them and watch out ;-)

63531430

Hi! I changed the unusual highway=destroyed to destroyed:highway=primary, see also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix