Maybe you need something like access=private here?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=social_path is only used here. If you want to express that nobody is allowed to use a path the tag access=no is enough. If you want to express that there is no path at all you can use was:highway=path or maybe historic:highway=path

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Why did you revert my correction?
The correct tag is highway="residential"
not highway="highway=residential"
way/530095171

Hi!
What is meant with highway=aerial on this way?
way/12507485
I think the last part is part of the driveway,
the middle looks like a hw=track and the first part might be a hw=path.

If you execute the overpass query you'll find a few ways which are still tagged with highway=crossing. This tag is only meant for nodes.

Ok, maybe also interesting for you:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual tag highway=stairs instead of steps.
I corrected that already, see
way/530043278
Is this way really still named Isolotto?
way/328132609

Hi!
Please review:
You changed a lot of ways with highway=footway + footway=crossing to
highway=crossing. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s9s
I assume this was not intended as highway=crossing should only be used to tag the shared node of the footway and the major road.
See highway=crossing
Please correct the data.

Ok, im Prinzip verwenden wir die gleiche Methoden. Ich frage mich aber, ob es nicht eher am Untergrund liegt, ob man die Fahrspuren gut sieht oder nicht. Ich habe halt lanes=1 verwendet, weil 2 der default für unclassified ist.
Ich habe aber nichts dagegen, wenn Du die von mir geänderten Wege nochmal änderst.

Danke für die Hinweise.
Woran erkenne ich bei Bing die besseren Wege? ImPrinzip scheint es hier je einen mehr oder weniger direkten Weg zwischen den einzelnen Häusern zu geben.
Die meisten buildings sind laut Bing okay,
bei den Straßen gibt / gab es halt jede Menge unverbundene Stückchen.
Wegen lanes: Gilt das für ganz Afrika?

Hi!
Please review way/443988643
and
way/443990679
You created some ways with multiple highway values like highway=service;footway or
highway=service;living_street
It seems that this is a common problem in the Go Map! App, so please watch out!

Moin!
Du hast hier einige Wege mit highway=pathless erzeugt.
An dieser Stelle wohl aus Versehen:
way/529790396
Warum willst Du z.B. hier nicht einen hw=path verwenden ?
way/529231499

Thanks! See changeset/52615712
where I changed the mapping for one footway. At this place it is not a sidewalk but a crossing, and it is not covered:
way/529882006
Always make sure that the node with highway=crossing is shared by the footway and the major road. The JOSM validator warns you where this is wrong, e.g. here
node/5143483206

Ich kenne die Sachlage nicht. Scheduled klingt nach "irgendwas in Richtung Bau passiert bereits" und das wäre dann mehr planned als proposed.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the ways with highway=crossing like this:
way/529511129
It should be tagged highway=footway + footway=crossing
and it should share a node wiith the major road. This shared node is tagged highway=crossing and maybe more tags like crossing=uncontrolled.
See crossing=*
You added layer=0 to many footways with tunnel=yes. I assume they are not tunnels, instead they are covered=yes.
See covered=*
The tag layer=0 is not needed as it is the default.
Hope this helps and happy mapping!

Moin!
Ich wundere mich gerade, dass dieser Weg mit foot=no gemapt ist:
way/61906895
Ich radl dort regelmäßig und wüßte nicht, dort ein Verbotsschild gesehen zu haben.
Woher kam die Info?

Moin!
Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass dieser Weg
als hw=track eingetragen ist:
way/65747884#map=15/52.9075/8.4260
Ich fahre dort regelmäßig mit dem Rad und habe noch nie einen Trecker oder so gesehen, ausser vielleicht zur Erhaltung des Weges. Warum hast Du es damals auf track geändert?

Hi again!
I am not happy with the changes to
way/30879935
1) The highway tag contans mixed values, only one can be right:
highway=residential;unclassified
2) The name tag contains now both the chinese and the english name.. Please don't do that. You the tag name:en for the english name. Is it "Fangyuan South Street" or "Fang Yuan Nan Road" ?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review mixed types highway="footway; path" on way way/84617566#map=17/48.78847/-123.62799
Maybe you also know the mtb:scale? See
mtb:scale=*

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used
highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table for a footbridge:
way/529168266
The usual tagging is
highway=footway + bridge=yes [+ layer=1]
I've seen the same problem before and all mappers used the online editor iD, but now it seems that Go Map! has the same problem? See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309