I've tried to fix mapping of
way/487482051
See changeset/51643049

Warum dann nicht highway=service anstelle des seltsamen highway=chess?
Tippfehler?

I cannot speak for the community. I'd prefer the other mapping method as it is less likely to break pedestrian routing. A missing sidewalk tag on a highway=residential is rather harmiess compared to a missing connection between all the highway=footway ways.

Hi!
Please review. I'd prefer
disused:highway=cycleway.
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
You did not change the route relation
relation/272134
I assume the closed ways should be removed?

Since there are so many relations you may also just change it to highway=service + access=no + psv=yes if that is apropriate.

Hi!
Please review unusal highway=bus_lane on way/431384284
I suggest to remove it and add lanes:bus=1
to the major road.
See lanes=*

See changeset/51633404

Hi!
Please review typo highway=bridge
on way/520288430
I assume you meant highway=track + brige=yes instead?
Also strange:
way/520288434
Is there a bridge and a ford?
If so, please draw two ways.

Sorry, it was highway=abandoned:path

Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned_path to
abandoned:highway=path
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned_path to
abandoned:highway=path
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Sorry, got impatient ;-)

Well, many mappers don't like imports at all.
Another reason may be that there are two very different tagging systems for sidewalks, both well established.
See osm.wiki/Sidewalks

Yes, that's why I don't think that this is the name of the footway.

I've changed them all, see
changeset/51615120

That is true, the difference is that you have used the tag on a way, not on a node.
I also assume that many are mistagged traffic_sign=* or maybe tourism=information.
Question is why you want to map the sign,
I think the important thing is that the corresponding highway has the correct name tag.

Ah, sorry, there is already a historic tag. I think the highway tag is obsolete here.

Sorry, don't understand. I posted links to two different turn restrictions. One is obsolete, one is incomplete (the no_u_turn)

What do you think about historic=city_gate?
historic=city_gate

Danke für die Rückmeldung :-)