OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
44961683

Hi!
Please review highway=turning_loop on
way way/464160701
The tag is only used for nodes:
highway=turning_loop
This looks like a trunk_link.

47816538

Hi!
You have mapped a lot of ways with highway=turning_loop. I think they are all link roads. A turning_loop is mapped on a node, see highway=turning_loop

51572683

Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of highway=unclassified on
way/519948346 and
way/520238039
Check the auto-complete function in JOSM ;-)

51603504

Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of highway=unclassified on
way/456356525

51588240

Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=red on
way/520059565
After doing that I found that the previous tag value unclassified was probably better as this road comes as unclassified from the tertiary in the west. I'd prefer unclassified for Dijksterbuursterlaan and maybe different maxspeed tags.

51564985

Hi!
Please review typo highway=give_way on
bridge
way/224781497
and connected road.
I assume you wanted to change a node?

50411337

Hi!
You changed a highway=service to highway=give_way here.
way/508754007
I assume you wanted to change a node ?
I also think that service=bus should be removed. Consider to add bus=yes or psv=yes

51564479

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review typo highway="foot way" on
way/512506829
The correct spelling is highway=footway

50758510

Sorry, it seems I've totally confused you here. I've corrected the tagging again.
I hope it is clear now?

38625615

I've changed it to highway=unclassified, you probably misunderstood the wiki about waterway=dam

51252569

Hi!
Please review highway=* on some ways here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rnb
I guess you misunderstood the wiki about winter_road. It says
"The highway=* should also be present on the way, and its value should reflect the importance of the given highway."
So, please use e.g. highway=path or highway=track

46166635

Hi!
Please review highway=*
on way/475298078
Bing shows a normal track next to the water which seems to connect two hamlets.

49956203

Hi!
Please review unusual highway=* on
way/504326309
I assume you meant something like highway=service + access=no + psv=yes
to map a way that can only be used by public transport ?

51412380

Hi!
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:unclassified
on way/447048931
If this way still exists
I think disused:highway=unclassified is better,
see also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

44944857

ah, sorry, copy+paste error :-(
I meant disused:highway=tertiary

44944857

Hi!
I know it's a bit late ;-)
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:tertiary
on way/464037325 and parallel way.
If this is still closed
I think disused:highway=service is better,
see also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

44168105

Hi!
Please review unusual tagging highway=closed:service
on way/453560865
Did you mean disused:highway=service?
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

45070912

Hi!
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:service
on way/409267010
If this way still exists
I think disused:highway=service is better,
see also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

46995851

Hi!
Please review:
Your change has left an invalid no_u_turn restriction:
relation/3525664
Not sure if this should be corrected or removed.
I also don't think that the new restriction is needed:
relation/7087744
after I changed the closed road from the unusual highway=closed:secondary to the common disused:highway=secondary
BTW: It is a no_right_turn ;-)
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

49319197

Hi!
I've changed highway=closed:primary
to the common disused:highway=primary.
I've also updates the route relations.
There are several route restrictions on the old roads. I assume these are also obsolete now?