Hi!
I guess you already know now:
Please don't use highway=uncassified_link / residential_link etc. These don't exist.
See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html

Hi!
please check typo highway=tre on some ways. Not sure if you meant residential or track. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rhf

Hi!
Please review highway=secondary; unclassified on way/411073443
What is correct?

please review highway=unclassified; tertiary
on way/144003908

similar problem on way/125352381

Hi!
Please review highway=steps;service
on these ways:
way/474067462
way/92629553
way/474067463

Moin!
Bitte schau mal way/150239156
an, Ist es ein path oder ein track?
Bei
way/107174492
ist noch mehr schiefgegangen:
highway=path;track
bicycle=no;yes

Hi!
Please review the type of roads.
I think both are highway=track

Hi!
Please check highway=secondary_link;construction on way/512962034
Did you mean highway=construction + construction=secondary_link ?

Hi!
Please check typo highway=tracktype on ways for CR31. The whole road looks like a hw=residential to me.

Hi!
Please review typo highway=tracktype
on two ways
way/236729313
way/236729314
Did you mean highway=track or did you want to add tracktype=* to the bridleway?

Hi!
Please check typo highway=ter on
way/8767499
To me it looks like a secodary_link .
It also seems to be connected to the wrong lane (oneway) in the south.

Hi!
Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:
way/403574708
way/403574710
Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ?

Hi!
Please check typo highway=street_lamp on
way/496889601
Looks like a barrier=hedge, but maybe you know more?

Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=stream
on way/508972904
I guess you meant waterway=stream + intermittent=yes ?
See also intermittent=*

Hi!
Please check: What did you try to map here?
way/438187615

Hi!
Please review way
way/442080900
I guess you wanted to map a trunk_link?

Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, das Du gelegentlich Objekte mit highway=turning_circle wie dieses erzeugst:
way/437345862#map=19/51.30286/6.59065
Passiert offensichtlich aus Versehen, aber vielleicht kannst Du mal drauf achten. Oder ist das doch Absicht?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rgv

Hi!
Please review way/468844630
The sat images show an amenity=parking,
not a circular way. A turning_circle should be mapped as a node, not a way. See also highway=turning_circle

Hi!
Du hast duiverse Wege auf highway=turning_circle geändert. Dabei gibt es zwei Probleme:
1) Das tag sollte nur für Punkte verwendet werden
2) Man sollte zwischen turning_loop und turning_circle unterscheiden
Was war denn die maproulette Aufgabe?