please review: The way/67478389
often seems to be very far from any road
according to Bing.
Should this be an existing way or something that is planned / in construction?

okay, thanks for the feedback :-)

I've changed that and tried to fix several other small problems, see
changeset/34899273

I've changed it, see
changeset/34898957

please review: what did you try to map here?
Is that way still needed?

please review:

I've changed highway=pre-existing prior to redevelopment to highway=dismantled
Maybe map the area that is rebuilt
as landuse=construction ?

okay, I'll ask the tagging list, I don't find any
often used tag .

please review way/245426879:
www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/245426879

What is meant with tag
highway=tinypath ?
Is it a highway=path with
a small width=* ?
Bing images don't show it at all.

Was hälst Du von
place=locality
surface=concrete
name=Treppenanlage
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dlocality

Habe mal drüber geschlafen .
Ich habe bisher immer landuse=residential
als Synonym für so was wie innerstädtische
Bebauung verstanden, in diesem Sinne würde es schon passen, aber laut wiki ist doch eher eine grössere Fläche gemeint.

thanks for the explanation. I think it is better to use a common tag like highway=path
for that in combination with access=*, e.g.
access=no,horse=private
and a note that explans the details.
Is that okay for you?

no idea?
I've changed it to
highway=proposed
note=was tagged highway=proccessed
for now

please review, I've changed
highway="proposed=cycleway"
to
highway=proposed
proposed=cycleway

please review:
the tag highway=giveway
should probably be
highway=give_way
The node should be part of the highway
that has to give way.
node/3803621100

I think you got me wrong. I meant the area
www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/370481910
Now I see that it really is a highway=services, so I'll correct that.
The way
way/323329578
seems to connect a singe building, so
highway=service was probably better,
maybe with service=driveway.
I don't understand why you use layer=-2 for it, that seems obsolete to me.

danke für die Rückmeldung. Musste erst mal rausfinden, das mit " Schleizer Dreieck"
eine Rennstrecke gemeint ist.
Den Weg 34403172 have ich gelöscht, den anderen kann man aus meiner Sicht mit highway=service taggen.
Wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe, wird die Straße ja nicht ausschliesslich als Rennstrecke genutzt, sonst wäre natürlich highway=raceway angebracht.

please review:
way/6341890 is only tagged name=Stiens
I guess you forgot landuse=residential,
or is it a boundary?

please review 229657294 and 230761448:
The tag highway=disabled is only used here.
Did you mean highway=abandoned?
Or maybe highway=construction?

please review: the tag highway=path.abandoned
was only used by you, I've changed it to
abendoned:highway=path

yes, I was talking about these additional and IMHO obsolete circles. The normal roundabouts (junction=roundabout) are okay.