Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tags like highway="secondary;closed"
The normal tagging would be e.g. disused:highway=secondary
See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
On the other hand, my understanding of the document at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1017/8401/files/052318_Road_Closure_Notice_-_Update_1_for_Lakeshore_Line_-_05-23-2018_-_8-49_AM.pdf?13447116664219722629 is that parts of the road are only closed for public access but is still in use? So maybe highway=service now?

Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=runway. The normal tagging would be aeroway=runway, see
aeroway=runway
I also wonder why so many roads in this area are highway=secondary. That looks like a copy+paste errror done in 2012.
Maybe you know better?

Hi! I wonder what you tried to map here.
You have created some ways with highway=route and more tags corresponding to the relation relation/2972065
Did you mean route=ferry instead? See
route=ferry

Hi!
What does highway=river in combination with waterway=river mean? Was it just a typo?
way/628625412
way/629292020

Hi! Please check typo highway=rei
on way/610876444
Looks like a hw=residential, but the
name Henriksdalsvägen is also on the tertiary road in the east.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped some proposed objects here. The normal tagging scheme for a proposed service road is : highway=proposed + proposed=service
For amenities, the prefix proposed is used, e.g. proposed:amenity=parking
See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

You seem to import data here and the quality looks very poor. It seems you did not read the corresponding guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
Please stop these imports for now, as it is likely that your edits are reverted.

Hi! Something seems to have gone wrong here, I see lots of unconnected nodes without any tags.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please check way/90194680
The ref was CW 80, which looks reasonable.
You added name=BOULEVARD 01 NOVEMBRE and also changed the ref to this value. I've revierted the change to the ref and changed the name to mixed case "Boulevard 01 Novembre"

Does anybody know the current status of this way: way/230135072 ?

Hmm, disused:highway=removed is still unusual. I think the idea of those prefixes is that you use the standard highway values. So, if the removed way was a highway=footway, the new value would be removed:highway=footway.

Hi! Please review invalid tag highway="path; track" on way way/626415632.
I assume you wanted to change track to path? I wonder how the remaining short hw=track can be used when only connected to hw=path.

Hi! Please check:
I've noticed a few ways in this area with highway=passing_place.
I guess you meant path instead? In case of way/571570144 I'd say it is a hw=service,
the other two near way/591546123 are not clearly shown on sat images. The position of the buildings in this area doesn't nearly match the sat images. Why?

Moin!
Was bedeuted denn ein highway=passing_place an einem Weg wie diesem: way/616165640 oder diesem way/616771802 ?

Hi!
I've noticed that you map highway=passing_place as a way in addition to the normal way as a single node here.
I wonder why. I also don't understand why those places have a name, I think that's unlikely.

Hi! Please check:
What does highway=no mean on this way:
way/85550573 ?
Just a typo?

Hi! Please review way way/550941097
with suspicous tag highway=passing_place. Sat images don't show a way, so it seems that this is a shortcut? Maybe use highway=path and trail_visibility=no
See trail_visibility=*.

Hi!
Please review two ways with suspicous highway=passing_place: way/599743162
way/599743169
I assume these are also natural=tree_row
like e.g. way/599743178 ?

Hi! I've noticed a lot of small areas with
natural=wood here. It seems that each one represents one tree. I think you should use a single node with natural=tree for this.

Hi!
You used the very unusual tag highway=minor for this road:
way/13515159
Why not unclassified?