okay, thanks for the feedback. In the meantime I found the tag brige=boardwalk,
guess that was what you wanted?

please review:
highway=bridge is rarely used and seems obsolete as the note says that the bridge is
dangerous. Is it okay to remove that tag?

please review:
way/42919798 was tagged
highway=bus_link. This is rarely used.
See my change in
changeset/34837052
If only busses are allowed, please change it to access=no,psv=yes and
remove the other access tags.

danke

please review:
I've changed highway=boardwalk
to bridge=yes,surface=wood
changeset/34836599
Bing doesn't show this. Is the other end of the footway still correct or was it replaced by this bridge?

sorry, should have checked my dictionary first. I've changed a part of the footway to bridge=yes,surface=wood,layer=1

please review:
node/2498651480 is tagged
highway=boardwalk
which is rarely used.
I assume it is either ford=yes or
a is there a bridge or maybe the waterway
goes through a tunnel=culvert?

please review:
The tag highway=blocked seems to say that
the road still exists but with access=no ?
Or maybe you meant highway=dismantled
or highway=construction?

please review my changes to the bunker
way/282754162:
changeset/34836228
See also
military=bunker

Bitte prüfen:
was bedeutet
highway=area,access=no
an way/79635540 ?
way/79635540

please review:
I've changed way/358240894:
highway=animal_crossing
to note=animal crossing"
+ access=no
but I am not sure if that is better.
I found no hint how this
should be tagged, but my understanding
is that it should not at all be used by
human?

please review:
I've removed way/245530971,
as it seems to go straight through a restaurant these days?

Bitte prüfen:
Muss es für einen Test das Tag highway=adit sein? Was wird denn damit getestet?
Siehe auch http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.html

please review:
I've fixed a typo
highway=abandonned
to
highway=abandoned
But maybe the correct tag is
highway=dismantled
as the road is barely visible now?

okay, I've changed that and also the oneway
problem

Bitte prüfen:
In Bing sieht man einen highway=track,
allerdings bezweifle ich, dass der den gleichen Namen (Rosenbacher Straße)
hat wie way/51409666.
Von daher sehe ich keinen Grund,
highway=unknown nach highway=track zu ändern und den Namen zu löschen.
Oder zeigt Bing nicht mehr den aktuellen
Zustand ?

please review:
highway=abandoned:path
or
highway=abandoned:track
are unusual.
I've changed them to abandoned:highway=*
Maybe better : use trail_visibility=no
and the normal highway=* tag to express
that the ways are hard to find.

Most of these roads where duplicates to existing roads and later removed.
highway=Voie communale
should have been
highway=residential or maybe
highway=unclassified ?

please review:
I've changed some typos in the highway tags
highway=tertiarity, highway=Tertiary -> highway=tertiary
I've also changed the direction of the oneway way/25360389.
See changeset/34821931
Maybe the link roads should also be changed? Please see
osm.wiki/Highway_link

I guess we need these two tags instead?
highway=construction
note="pont sur route gp3"