Hi!
I've changed the unusual mapping of the footbridge, see changeset/52163293
I guess you were mislead by iD, see also
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Wird auch gerade hier diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59786

Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass es den Spessart zwei mal gibt. Siehe relation/3894648
Die beiden beschreiben unterdessen fast exakt die gleiche Fläche, das soll wahrscheinlich nicht so sein, oder?

Hi!
Please check this junction:
node/4544152911
The roads are not connected.

Hi!
Please review this bride. See
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped some roads with highway=unpaved here. The highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface. The roads seem to be for agricultural use, so I've changed them to highway=track. This implies surface=unpaved.
You also used building=yes for a place that seems to have multiple huts. Please map each single hut as building=yes or building=hut, and you can use landuse=residential to map the area around those buildings.
Hope this helps and happy mapping!

OK, so I guess that the sat image is outaged, See changeset/52108756
LPI NSW also shows a large building in the south of this place which doesn't appear in the map.

Neh, will ich auch nicht. Passiert anders wo auch immer wieder, weil halt JOSM meckert.
Irgendwo hast Du auch einfach alles entfernt, was nicht üblich ist. Könnte man hier evtl auch machen.

Yes, and another potential problem here is that one may confuse area:highway=service with highway=services + area=yes as in highway=services

Yes, area:highway is used by special renderers.
Looking again at it I think in case of relation/5673340
you really improved the mapping.
Sorry for the noise. I found other cases that IMHO did not improve the data, see changeset/47783387

Moin!
Warum hast Du z.B. hier
way/403882576
aus Area=0 area=0 gemacht?
Aus meiner Sicht war das irgendein Import, bei dem Area etwas ganz anderes bedeutet als area (=yes/no)

Hi and welcome to OSM!
What is meant with highway="whera road" on way/524838765 ?
Bing shows a way that looks like a highway=residential.

Hi!
Did you see my comment here?
changeset/46530165

Think it was this one:
relation/5673340

Sorry, seems I forgot to add a link to the object that lead me to this CS :-(
Not sure if that is better. On a single, closed way the tag area:highway is used to map the area covered by the road itself, while highway=pedestrian + area=yes says that the area within the way is usable for pedestrians.
You may still find obstacles like an amenity=fountain inside it.
I tried to find the problem relation again but failed :-(
I think I searched for members of MP-relations with a highway tag which don't have a highway tag.

Well, don't know enough about railway mapping, but as a cyclist I know that I don't like to cycle on rails ;-)
I hesitate to edit something here because sat images show the road and the POI next to it at very different positions, e.g.
this fountain
node/4027321793
seems to be 8m from its real position.

By the way: I see some rails with bicycle=y or yes here. What does it mean?

Well, sorry for sounding bold. English is my 2nd language. It seems that "LPI NSW" sat images are out-dated in this place as they show the road and the rails at a different position. Maybe look at node/2347313297
This was also created by you and corresponds to the wiki reg. the highway=crossing tag. I just don't understand the tag ramp=both on it.
Maybe something like kerb=lowered as in
osm.wiki/Key%3Akerb ?

You see? No mention of highway=crossing to be used on ways here.

Don't think so. The wiki separates clearly between nodes and ways. Please review.
crossing=*
I refer to "The tag is set for the node where the both ways are crossing (footway and street, street and railway and so on). For detailed mapping it may be useful to tag ways leading from a sidewalk to the crossing node with footway=crossing or cycleway=crossing as appropriate. "