They're based on the 2016 Census. I will be more concise with my changeset comments in the future. I just run out of time and space. And the place types are all correct. What is "jhdks899"?

The park is unnamed & its extent was imported from CanVec 6 (on October 9, 2010; 8 years ago), so officially the grassland isn't part of the park. I will fix the path by turning highway=turning_loop into highway=path tomorrow :).

Best Regards,

EzekielT

Sorry. I almost never do edits outside of Toronto and my edits are usually over a way smaller area than most other power users, ironically including yourself. Also, the only thing I added outside of Toronto is Richmond, BC, so not much to scan mistake-wise.

Best Regards,

EzekielT

As in:

Kingdom of the Netherlands (including the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten) -> admin_level=2

Netherlands -> admin_level=2

Curaçao -> admin_level=2.

Aruba -> admin_level=2.

Sint Maarten -> admin_level=2.

Maybe we should tag all of them (Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Netherlands, Aruba, Sint Maarten, and Curaçao) as admin_level=2, as they're all officially countries!

That's what I knew all this time, but I guess all of you still didn't listen :).

I hadn't known & thought it was bad grammar. Thanks for the advice :).

Congratulations on your 7,000th edit :D.

I've fixed it in my latest changeset. Thanks :).

Sorry, this is obviously wheelchair accessible. I don't know what I was thinking :D!

See? When you explain things without prejudice, I'll listen :).

That is true, I hadn't thought of that. Thanks for correcting my mistake :).

If you look at taginfo, contact:yelp has been used 520 times by 35 different users: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact:yelp.

You were the first one making personal allegations, by insisting that I think my tagging is "funny", and that I focus on making "parodistic" (a world you seem to LOVE using all the time) contributions, even though I never said nor implied it (and it isn't true, it's a false statement). And also by believing that I added fiction, even though it was a misunderstanding (I was sourcing from Google and Wikipedia because no one had told me we weren't allowed to source from them). Also, I'm not the first one to use the key addr:continent, it's been used 252 times by 32 different users: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:continent. And the fact that you're only picking on my edits seals my "allegations" as true (even though your comments are based on tiny things that no one commented on, and are not deemed important at all). And yes, edits on OSM may be "peer reviewed" but not as intensively as you are, raising "issues" that no one else thinks nor cares about (such as displaying sidewalk=both and individual footpaths beside). Besides, the way you talk doesn't sound "peer reviewed". Sounds more like "enemy reviewed", attacking me with negative comments that have nothing to do with the actual changeset (such as calling my contributions "parodistic" and "nonsense"). If you'd approached your complaints nicely, then you'd get a friendly comment back. But you've been aggressively mean since the beginning, showing no signs of friendliness at all to me. For example, you never use the word "please", and you keep calling my contributions "nonsense" and "parodistic" over and over again. It works like this: you treat me nice, I treat you nice, I treat you nice, you treat me nice. Don't just make a mean comment and expect a nice comment back. Just try to think how to explain my mistakes in a more friendly way, like most other contributors do :). Don't make allegations of what you think I'm doing without asking, it's better to ask me what I'm actually doing first.

You were the first one making personal allegations, by insisting that I think my tagging is "funny", and that I focus on making "parodistic" (a world you seem to LOVE using all the time) contributions, even though I never said nor implied it (and it isn't true, it's a false statement). And also by believing that I added fiction, even though it was a misunderstanding (I was sourcing from Google and Wikipedia because no one had told me we weren't allowed to source from them). Also, I'm not the first one to use the key addr:continent, it's been used 252 times by 32 different users: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:continent. And the fact that you're only picking on my edits seals my "allegations" as true (even though your comments are based on tiny things that no one commented on, and are not deemed important at all). And yes, edits on OSM may be "peer reviewed" but not as intensively as you are, raising "issues" that no one else thinks nor cares about (such as displaying sidewalk=both and individual footpaths beside). Besides, the way you talk doesn't sound "peer reviewed". Sounds more like "enemy reviewed", attacking me with negative comments that have nothing to do with the actual changeset (such as calling my contributions "parodistic" and "nonsense"). If you'd approached your complaints nicely, then you'd get a friendly comment back. But you've been aggressively mean since the beginning, showing no signs of friendliness at all to me. For example, you never use the word "please", and you keep calling my contributions "nonsense" and "parodistic" over and over again. It works like this: you treat me nice, I treat you nice, I treat you nice, you treat me nice. Don't just make a mean comment and expect a nice comment back. Just try to think how to explain my mistakes in a more friendly way, like most other contributors do :). Don't make allegations of what you think I'm doing without asking, it's better to ask me what I'm actually doing first.

Your comments on the yelp tagging are dubiously important, at best. I never added fiction to OSM, you're speaking of an issue already dealt with over a year ago. I'm not using funny tagging! You're just trying to find ways to disapprove of me, and I've shown multiple signs that I don't want your attention. Please do NOT answer this comment!

That is totally wrong, don't believe him. Stop following me, Polarbear! Leave me ALONE!

(And you don't have to respond).

Okay, but can you please treat me nicer (at least a little bit)? OSM is supposed to be a community, not a rivalry.

You'd said "We don't use different keys for singular/plural." - I guess you changed your mind :)?