Gazer75's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141495337 | Stien er meir eller mindre synleg på foto som går 19 år tilbake i tid, så det er vel ikkje heilt rett. |
|
| 141495337 | Sidan du ikkje kan vise til eit vedtak frå kommunen så kan stien vere der og folk kan bruke den. Om du fortset og slette så vil du bli rapportert til DWG for vandalisme. |
|
| 141495337 | Reversert. Allemannsretten vil gjelde her. |
|
| 141298893 | Suggestion:
|
|
| 141298893 | The tags hour_on and hour_off is not really valid anymore if they were ever used. You'd have to use conditional restrictions to define when the gate is closed to general traffic. |
|
| 140169928 | Har reversert og lagt inn access tag på vegen. |
|
| 140169928 | Ikkje slett vegar på den måten. Om dette er ein privat veg som er skilta private eller avstengt så kan du legge på access tags. Står info om dette på wiki |
|
| 139911937 | Pretty sure that way/1163848956 need to be replaced by way/1163848955
|
|
| 127814304 | Of course, my bad... I find it hard to figure out who made the actual error. |
|
| 127814304 | Please don't duplicate charging stations. The node is for a group of chargers, not individual dispensers. I've removed the duplicates leaving one as it should be. |
|
| 137466895 | Hit enter to early on accident.
|
|
| 136959860 | I've reverted this already. The bottom part of that article mentioned that the old tunnel is closed for upgrades until 2024. |
|
| 136959860 | This is wrong. The old tunnel is closed for upgrades while the new south tube is open. Please revert your changes. |
|
| 130967963 | Where did you get the voltages from? AFAIK they are all wrong unless they recently built a new substation at the Charlottetown generating station. Last I heard that was not happening before 2030 or something.
|
|
| 130888641 | Did they rebuild way/942697064 as dual circuit recently? |
|
| 130883424 | Looks like you've just selected all nodes in the line and tagged it as a power=pole completely disregarding my detailed mapping. Like the terminal at the transition station. Please don't do this and ruin other peoples work. Thank you. |
|
| 130883424 | Why did you change the towers to poles? That is not accurate for that high voltage level no matter the design. Those are towers. Poles are for distribution lines mostly. |
|
| 30434146 | Om du tenker way, så kan den sikkert det. Er mykje gammalt N50 som ikkje lenger stemmer. Folk fiksar litt her og der etter kvart. Berre litt viktig at ein har kontroll på relasjonar og forstår korleis dei fungerer. |
|
| 133275324 | I'd suggest going with the lifecycle prefix was:*=* on the tags for the ferries. Disused might not be supported in many cases, and many maps will still show a route as long as the ferry tags are there. A was:route=ferry will not. |
|
| 113340063 | Careful when editing. You managed to move way/709830242 back to the old 66kV spot. I had made a note on the line warning about this :) Maxar was more up to date in the area than the Norwegian orthophoto. Currently only the low res orthophoto layer is up to date.
|