GOwin's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 64341994 | Good job, with your edits. Thank you! |
|
| 63744667 | Road segment classification changed from secondary_link to motorway_link , misintepreting imagery. Eventually corrected in changeset/65684358
|
|
| 63746754 | Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
|
|
| 63746922 | Another case of certain segments being deleted and replaced.
|
|
| 63746877 | Why delete way/636724435 and way/636724435, only to have them added back later in a newer changeset?
|
|
| 63785350 | way/637107125 looks like a service road, rather than residential. Other edits look okay.
|
|
| 63814868 | Another case where part of a segment was deleted, then later re-added as new segment.
|
|
| 63815061 | way/637347194 seems better tagged as service
|
|
| 64185771 | way/641104670 doesn't seem like a road. Other edits look okay.
|
|
| 64186885 | Added unnecessary oneway=yes tag on roundabout. Deleted a road segment, then replaced it with a new one.
|
|
| 64187103 | Deletion of way/283153259, which appears to be a valid feature from the imagery. Other edits in this changeset seems okay.
|
|
| 64189091 | Another huge changeset covering edits in Thailand and Panama's coastline!
|
|
| 64197629 | Editors should avoid working on huge areas in one changeset - edits in WA, USA and Kedah, MY. Also, described as "editing lanes" but no such lane editing was made in that changeset.
|
|
| 64216940 | Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: way/200605189, way/200605190, way/200605197
|
|
| 64281932 | In the same changeset, editor appears to add features using multiple imagery sources - but does not factor offsets between imagery.
|
|
| 64763083 | Is the editor a validator? Changeset appears to be mostly deletions, but from the imagery appear to be valid edits, although many are incorrectly tagged - buy why delete when they may be corrected instead?
|
|
| 64315740 | New road based on outdated Bing imagery and appears to be temporary, as road and building it serves is no longer visible in newer imagery (ESRI, DG, Mapbox)
|
|
| 64391678 | Although, way/643248396 was subsequently deleted in c64763083, the original editor appears correct, and Mapillary imagery does show what seems like a service road, albeit incorrectly tagged as residential. way/242719186 tagged as scrub, could also have been deleted, as well.
|
|
| 63747914 | Geometry offset errors could've been improved.
|
|
| 63222048 | Major offset difference could've been corrected.
|