OpenStreetMap
GBAB's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 143665357 | Szia Tamás!
|
|
| 142309165 | I know some of them though not all. My reasoning is that if a bar in Italy has "cafe", "caffetteria" or something like this even in its name then it is very probably an amenity=cafe May be that I wasn't right. |
|
| 105111328 | Carissimo Andrea,
|
|
| 131571437 | Dear Elian D, it seems that there is a village (comuna) with the name Plăieșii de Jos. It has two parts: Plăieșii de Jos and Plăieșii de Sus: Comuna:
Southern part:
Northern part:
Thus, apparently both the comuna itself and its southern part are called Plăieșii de Jos, at least in Romanian. In Hungarian it seems more straightforward because the comuna is Kászon https://www.kaszon.ro , its Northern part is Kászonfeltíz while the southern part is Kászonaltíz. So this should be mapped somehow. |
|
| 141853456 | Igen, „az úgy volt”, hogy szerkesztettem egy kicsit, s közben egy másikunk is szerkesztett, s én csak őutána töltöttem fel a saját dolgaimat, amelyeket valójában előtte rajzoltam be, úgyhogy ilyen felemás lett a végeredmény. De ez egy alkalom, hogy kicsit javítsak rajta.
|
|
| 73200688 | Lieber Magonreal9,
water_well würde eigentlich für ein Brunnen stehen, eine Zisterne ist aber kein Brunnen, deshalb kann es vielleicht interessant sein, dass wir diesen Unterschied deutlich machen. Sie könnte ja auch in die description kommen, sie wird aber selten angesehen, deshalb ist es eindeutiger wenn sie als name erscheint. Allerdings bin ich überzeugbar…
Gábor |
|
| 86921968 | Dear Tomas_J,
|
|
| 135332615 | Hi szydzio,
|
|
| 135332615 | Hello szydzio,
|
|
| 135893903 | Lieber Dieter,
|
|
| 131398029 | Szia Gza! Szerintem tehetsz egy próbát itt:
|
|
| 131589988 | Hja, ráadásul én voltam a későbbi: fogalmam sincs, mint néztem el. Talán az történt, hogy amikor megszerkesztettem, még nem volt ott a másik, aztán csak egy-két nappal később jutott eszembe feltölteni, s akkor már ott volt mellette a következő is… |
|
| 122290140 | Bocsánat… (Nem emlékszem, mi járt a fejemben annak idején.)
|
|
| 129103468 | Dear Iberges,
|
|
| 128535535 | Sokkal elegánsabb lett volna, ha ezt már a módosításkészlet megjegyzésébe is beleírom… No, majd legközelebb. ;-) |
|
| 128535535 | A forrás az Európai Unió Kiadóhivatala:
|
|
| 126418481 | Lieber dieterdreist, carissimo Dino, please look also at this graph:
* * * * * As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes. crossing= refers to the type of the crossing e.g. whether it has a traffic signal or just a marking on the pavement.
crossing_ref= refers to the shape of the pedestrian crossing. It was invented for England where there are several shapes of pedestrian crossing (zebra, tiger, pelican, toucan, puffin, whatever). Since in continental Europe each and every pedestrian crossing is "zebra", it has little use but it does not harm either.
If you use crossing=zebra, you mix the above attributes. Actually, as the OSM wiki states, "it has gained worldwide usage with the _temporary_ adoption by iD editor", however, as you can see on the above graph, in the last two years its usage almost stagnated (in contrast of crossing_id=zebra). Thus what I have done was to change crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. No information was lost but the consistency of the map was improved. I don't think it was dangerous or harming of any aspect. |
|
| 126417850 | Lieber dieterdreist, please look also at this graph:
* * * * * As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes. crossing= refers to the type of the crossing e.g. whether it has a traffic signal or just a marking on the pavement.
crossing_ref= refers to the shape of the pedestrian crossing. It was invented for England where there are several shapes of pedestrian crossing (zebra, tiger, pelican, toucan, puffin, whatever). Since in continental Europe each and every pedestrian crossing is "zebra", it has little use but it does not harm either.
If you use crossing=zebra, you mix the above attributes. Actually, as the OSM wiki states, "it has gained worldwide usage with the _temporary_ adoption by iD editor", however, as you can see on the above graph, in the last two years its usage almost stagnated (in contrast of crossing_id=zebra). Thus what I have done was to change crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. No information was lost but the consistency of the map was improved. I don't think it was dangerous or harming of any aspect. |
|
| 126418481 | Carissimo Dino,
|
|
| 126418481 | Direi di no, almeno non con intenzione. Spero che non abbia rotto nessuna relazione importante o cose del genere… |