Because of this simplicity, the disputed area has partial control between the two countries, so it is convenient to use one area and it can be easily posted on Wikipedia.

In addition, the change from 7 to 3 is hopefully highlighted. After all, this area does not want overwhelming control in southern Tibet. Therefore, it hopes to express the claimed routes of both countries on the OSM's default rendering.

My mother tongue is not English and I cannot communicate smoothly in English. Can you simply retell your question?

I also know that you are worried that, in fact, you can find that my series of boundary editors basically does not involve the disputed areas. It is just some of the borders identified by the existing two countries. The data used before OSM may be a bit error.

Because this is the actual control line between the two countries

I also understand the specific conditions of the disputed areas between the two countries. Please rest assured that I will not arbitrarily modify the actual control boundary. As a user editing in the South China Sea, I know how tortured the boundary is.

My modification of the boundary is a feeling that some places are inconsistent with actual control. For example, some ravines are clearly in one of the countries and there are roads leading to them. If you don't think this is acceptable, you can discuss or return my editor.

恶意修改

You can open Wikipedia for more comprehensive information.

Specific use please refer to

osm.wiki/China_Tagging_Guidelines

The Chinese community is relatively closed, and mappers who are interested in other regions of China are less likely to get information.

If you are very concerned about the China region, you may consider joining the WeChat group exchange, which has English-speaking users.

Using city tags in China is not determined by the population

不是这样编辑的啊 关系：新兴县 (3031848) 只加边界里面的乡镇边界另外创建关系

你这样用JOSM更快 用ID事倍功半

thank you for you revert

Do not undermine China's actual control of the island's content

Do not undermine China's actual control of the island's content

Do not undermine China's actual control of the island's content

why delete node？

不要黏在一起

The source is based on the data from China's official mapping bureau, and their boundary data can be consulted for comparison.

I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reason. Sorry

I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reason. Sorry