OpenStreetMap
ForstEK's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 65723054 | with note/1492856 as source |
|
| 55844523 | I wrote about oil tanks but no about silos. If you mean oil tanks with stable roof and with floating roof you should use other tag (for exapmle. like osm.wiki/Simple_3D_buildings#Roof), because the tag "covered=yes" is for cases, where you need to mark two vertical layer in the one place on the map. Please read the wiki article with attention: covered=*. In these and many other tanks on top and below is nothing - only one layer. For underground tanks we use tag man_made=reservoir_covered (man_made=reservoir_covered). But due to your logic you should write tag "covered=yes" on every building which has a roof, shouldn't you? |
|
| 55844523 | Hi, Hendrikklaas! Please see wiki: covered=* way/556599652 - for these objects you shouldn't use tag "covered=yes", so there are nothing on top above them . All oil tanks have a roof, this is default constructive. Covered=yes is used in other cases. |
|
| 64673022 | Здравствуйте! Основная идея была - сделать из точечных с maps.me площадные. По поводу тега, возможно, Вы правы, leisure=fitness_station чаще встречается, перетегируйте, если хотите. |
|
| 63271510 | Hi, gilesgao! Please verify this road: way/631472617 - you write as source bing imagery, but on bing imagery this road can't seen. On DigitalGlobe Premium imagery an industrial landuse is here. Is this road exist in fact? |
|
| 58030080 | Why do you mean that imagery was outdated? Are you local mapper? |
|
| 49415748 | ||
| 63138415 | ||
| 63077351 | ||
| 63035355 | ||
| 63016868 | ||
| 62988811 | ||
| 62741798 | ||
| 62774340 | ||
| 62425162 | ||
| 62386944 | ||
| 15125921 | Судя по снимкам, цистерны. changeset/62104435 |
|
| 15125921 | Здравствуйте, Евгений!
|
|
| 60399218 | Ok, if you local mapper, you know better 'cause these tiles hadn't time info. |
|
| 21741722 | Здравствуйте, Егамай! Вы уверены, что здесь пешеходный переход? node/2795667416 или это просто ошибка? |