Здравствуйте, paulsterndimosca, перед тем, как удалять объекты, читайте вики: линейные скамейки - это не маразм, а давно устоявшаяся форма отображения: osm.wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dbench

Здравствуйте!
Вы начертили линию без тэгов: way/572059664 - что это такое?

source for names and gvr:codes http://textual.ru/gvr/index.php?card=192995&bo=0&rb=0&subb=0&hep=0&wot=0&name=%E0%E9-%E3%F3%ED-%E5%E3%E0%ED&loc=

Hi, Hendrikklaas!
You edit in this changeset some storage tanks with tags "covered=yes" and "building:material=concrete", for example:
way/541544040/history.
Please see wiki here: covered=* - there is about tag "covered" used in other cases, not here. And do you sure by imagery, the storage tanks material is concrete? Usually it is steel.

Hi! Please see here: node/4900715537/history - in this point, created in your changeset, there is no tag about type - what is this object?

Hi! Please see here: way/263239924 - now the tag "type=gas" for pipelines is outdated - better "substance=gas", can you change this? For example: substance=*.
###
¡Hola! Por favor vea aquí: way/263239924 - ahora la etiqueta "type=gas" para lasertos está desactualizada-mejor "substance=gas", ¿puedes cambiar esto? Por ejemplo: substance=*.

salut! please see here: way/307880948#map=11/48.7384/-0.6144 -maintenant, l'étiquette "type" pour les pipelines est périmée-meilleure "substance=gas", pouvez-vous changer cela? par exemple: osm.wiki/wiki/key:substance.

Hi! Please see here: way/307880948#map=11/48.7384/-0.6144 - now the tag "type" for pipelines is outdated - better "substance=gas", can you change this? For example: substance=*.

Bravo! You just delete indiscriminately both changed and newly created objects without asking and without understanding, and by the way, I spent a lot of time editing and creating them, verified and based on the imagery, which is what it says in comments on changeset. With all due respect to your experience, the revert of this changeset is pure vandalism.
This package of edits was created as part of the participation in the project http://streak.osmz.ru/ where there is a task to create a changeset with a large bounding box - it is not prohibited. If you understand and appreciate my work, please turn off this revert.

It's deal with not a Russian or English page, but in a centralized solution. How many useless fixes! My argument is for the predominant option according to taginfo - there's less work to do to bring everything to one scheme (in the world). We have four different wiki pages now: in English, Czech, German and Russian. Accordingly to stay to just one option, but the current situation seems like a mess.

Hi, woodpeck.
Try to understand.
Yes, I know this rule, but I repeat that the all objects in this changeset were checked by bing images in QGIS, the same could have been created in JOSM, so I do not agree about mechanical editing. Yes, you find a mistake with a chimney inside the cooling tower, but I only checked the cooling towers themselves by downloading them into geojson via overpass. Is it worth discussing every edit at all with the community? I think the question here is more of a tag choice - it doesn't matter to me, but man_made=tower + tower:type=cooling is used much more often according to taginfo and does not cause warnings in the wiki. I am against any "war of changesets", I think it is worth voting and choosing one end variant, but argumentatively, and not for mapping under the render. No one wants meaningless fixes, and everyone is sorry to redo their work, I also did a lot of work when processing these cooling towers, so this issue should be resolved from the top.

Hi, young mapper!
First, this is not a mechanical edit, but a correction of the wrong tagging scheme according to the wiki. Openstreetmap is a large geodatabase, and there are rules, they are set out in the wiki, the database must be in order, and your rollback has returned a mess. The tag man_made=cooling_tower is outdated, it is described there. In addition, the package of edits have been removed extra outdated tags like source=bing (by the rules, this is written in the notes to the package of edits).
Second, if you "doubt", this not means, that I not tested - first find the example wrong changed object, and then discuss it.
Third, in addition to JOSM, there are many other, more complex and strong programs and tools - overpass, QGIS, ArcGIS, QuickMapServices, Level0 and others - the data of that changeset were checked by WMS layers bing and others in QGIS.

Наверно чуть позже, в планах было на весь мир, попробую на выходных

Так а зачем передвинули? Я без наездов, просто хотел понять, что это за точка, барельеф там или что? suslikk молчит пока :), хотя спрашивал его тоже.

Здравствуйте! Вы отредактировали точку без описания - node/1692802076.
Что это такое?

Здравствуйте! Вы создали точку без описания - node/1692802076.
Что это такое?

operator = Petrochina

Karamay petrochemical plant

See in all other languages: osm.wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type%3Dcooling for example - here tagging "building=industrial and man_made=cooling_tower" mark as deprecated!

Hi! You retagged the cooling towers according a wrong page (it should be deleted). Please see wiki: tower:type=cooling.
In the all cases tag "man_made" for industrial objects, inside them people can't live and work!
See here: man_made=* -
A tag for identifying man-made (artificial) structures added to the landscape. See also building=* for buildings.
The cooling towers should be tagged: "man_made=tower and tower:type=cooling".