Hello. I have reverted your edits because they were based on outdated aerial imagery sources. These buildings were part of a middle school that moved one block north. I've been to these sites in person, and you can verify these changes for yourself by using Clark County's GIS, OpenWeb, as a source: https://maps.clarkcountynv.gov/openweb/?@759271,26763777,6 (these pictures are as of September 9, 2025, whereas Bing's is before at least 2025).

changeset/173236256

"there are English-language speakers (as learned language) outside this countries, far more than Russian-language speakers (as learned language)"
How many of these L2 English speakers reside INSIDE Europe, but OUTSIDE of the UK, Ireland, Cyprus, and Malta?

"Now count the amount of ESL speakers and compare THESE to people who know Russian (first AND secondary lang) in Europe."
Some European countries that have lots of Russian speakers (L1 + 2) are Ukraine and Belarus. Basically, imagine any former republic of the USSR in Europe, and they're likely to have at least European speakers. How could we count these L1+2 Russian and English speakers?

I checked the history of the changed way, and it turns out that the street _does_ have a bus bay, and I used aerial imagery to determine which side(s) of it the bus bay is on.

I counted speakers in geographically-defined Europe. This means I included speakers of Russian in European Russia but excluded English speakers in the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania (since they're not part of Europe). Under THAT metric, there are more Russian speakers, since Russia (even only including European Russia) has more people than the UK, Ireland, Cyprus, and Malta combined (European countries that speak English).

Okay. Then explain the fixme requests that I tried to, you know, fix? (I feel like it can't be both ways.)

I've already stated my concerns and objections to their removal; please read above to find them. Thanks.

Those are TIGER tags. To be honest, I don't know what those specific ones mean.

Okay then, thanks for the information! (And for correcting me on my typos 😅)

Because it's the continuation of SR 210. I was unsure if the non-freeway segment of SR 210 had the same/similar traffic volumes to the freeway segments. However, based on your comment, it appears as if it doesn't, so I won't undo your changes here (that and the fact that I don't live here). Also, you mentioned that "[2100 South] has been bypassed [...] by SR-201 and I-80," but in reality, this segment of 2100 South 𝘪𝘴 SR 201, at least according to Wikipedia.
(Also, you missed some spots)

Hello, where did you get information about William Ranch Road having a ref of 1791? Neither this changeset nor the way have any sources listed. Thanks.

Honestly, I think both of them might be caused by Vespucci failing to recognize my changes. Please read the changeset comment; maybe a fix in iD will do the job.

You can delete GEOIDFQ if it doesn't do anything. Like I said before, I already converted the remaining TIGER tags into OSM-readable tags.

Thanks for fixing these typos! I don't know why I didn't catch them earlier, hahaha.

Again, I didn't add those GEOIDFQ tags myself; they came with the converted GEOJSON files I downloaded. A few other tags came automatically (like `NAME=Congressional District 1`), but I was easily able to either convert those into OSM-compatible tags (in this case, `name=Congressional District 1`) or delete them.

Honestly, I'm not sure. That tag came from TIGER data that came with the GEOJSON file I downloaded.

Hi, why did you retag those roads as motorways as opposed to motorway links? Having motorways "intersect" like that at forks (see exit 15B) causes problems, like Osmose errors and routing errors (i.e., "Turn right on Boulder City Parkway, US 93 Business" from OSRM).

Okay, I'll go change it back. The map of state-maintained highways included this road in the Clark County section, so it's all based on that xD

Hello, why did you classify the "Rock Peak" road as secondary? It's completely disconnected from all other secondary (or higher) roads.

Thank you for responding; I didn't expect this, LOL. It's common for "streets" (as they are defined according to Strong Towns) to have streetside parking, possibly to narrow the street, causing drivers to be more careful. Pedestrian streets don't always forbid cars per se, but if they're allowed, they are treated as "guests" while the pedestrians are given normal access.

Okay, I'll go change them back.