According to streetlevel imagery, not all street signs in the area display directional prefixes. Therefore, adding them would be a violation of the "on-the-ground" rule. This doesn't even count the fact that some streets' directional prefixes are "mismatched" (i.e., "North Main Street" without "South Main Street"). However, because these are still important for addresses, I've preserved them in `name:full` and `name:prefix`, in line with what Utah does.

Hello, please do not use abbreviations in names. Also, please don't put "BLDG#" in the name. I suggest using the tags building=apartments, operator=Mountain GateTrails Apartments, and either ref=(building number) or addr:unit=(building number). Thank you.

Okay, thanks!

Just as an FYI: You don't need footway:surface on footways. That tag would come in play in this scenario:
* You map a traffic road and notice that it has sidewalks made of concrete. You would tag the traffic road with `sidewalk=both` and `footway:surface=concrete`.
For the footways themselves, `surface=concrete` should be good enough.

Oh, okay then. Could you please edit the tags to match what you said? I wouldn't know how to map something entirely underground (or covered), hahaha.

Hello, what was your reasoning for changing `highway=footway` to `highway=path`? This looks a lot like a sidewalk, except for the part at the eastern end (the one with the fixme). What _does_ it lead to, anyway?

Did I say "Way" Boulevard? I meant Ryan Boulevard 🤦‍♂️

Here's where I got the idea that India (or Bharat) "prefers" Hindi over English:
From Wikipedia: "According to Part XVII of the Constitution of India, Hindi in the Devanagari script is the official language of the Union, along with English as an additional official language."
Hindi is native to India, whole English is only used because that was the language of its former colonizers. It isn't unheard of for countries to change its name from a colonial language to a native one, like Swaziland changing its name to eSwatini, or Turkey to Türkiye.

Keep in mind that:
1. This is my first proposal ever, so I'm unfamiliar with its process. There's a section labeled "Examples," and I made these edits specifically for that section
2. As I mention in the proposal, "motorway" is technically not a classification based on importance, like primary and trunk. Instead, "motorway" is a physical characterization.
3. These local classifications are based on a comment I received from Joseph RP about trunk roads and expressways:
"Route 95/11, the 215, and I-15 would be classified as trunk, while Summerlin Parkway, the Airport Connector, and the motorway spur of the [U.S.] 93 Business Loop would all be classified as primary."

Hello, why did you remove highway:motorway tags? This is for a new proposal of tags.

changeset/170594839

osm.wiki/Proposal:Motorway_classifications

I am well aware of the difference. Many roads have short cul-de-sacs with no name but have the same address as the road they're branching off of, hence why I tagged these as highway=pipestem and addr:street=(road that it branches off of).

A good chunk of this route was named "Old Highway 91," which I moved into ref=US 91 Hist. Of course, it's no Historic Route 66, so maybe ref=US 91 Old (for the ways) and network=US:US:Old (for the relation)? The only problem is that I doubt it has any support or usage, for that matter.

Hello, where did you get information about the extension of Maryland Parkway from Sunridge Heights Parkway to Volunteer Boulevard?

I have fixed those tags now, thanks for reminding me 👍

Done ✅

relation/13834231, relation/15031205, relation/15031207. Fixed typos

That sounds like a good idea. I guess this is what happens when the "community" of a particular state only has a few people living in it xD
Also, unrelated, but this is the second time I've been invited to a discussion on an OSM forum.

Okay, I'll go change it back.

The term "Las Vegas Valley" refers to two things: The metropolitan area and the natural feature. The former's boundaries are exactly the same as Clark County's; for the latter, editors like Vespucci will warn me that valleys should not be closed ways. I am currently working to define the natural valley's boundaries by compiling information from different websites. So far, I've mapped the valley's northern and eastern boundaries.