Alright then... Well, what's to be done about the tertiary stubs at Tule Springs Parkway and Theme Road (near a park)?

You're welcome! Which part(s) of the old border were inaccurate?

Okay, thanks!

Yes, it was...
Exit 14 appears to be the last interchange that Los Patrones Parkway has before the freeway section terminates.

Typo: I forgot to REMOVE the fixme from the Las Vegas relation.

Okay, I will downgrade them accordingly. Thanks once again!

Okay, I'll go check it out. Thanks!

Sorry I didn't see this earlier (why does Gmail mark some of these replies as "Promotional"?). I went ahead and changed all the roads I edited back to secondary. Since you upgraded Hollywood Boulevard anyway, I extended Charleston's primary designation to Hollywood Boulevard since it still appears to be a major throughfare. Also, a new bridge over the Las Vegas Wash connecting Lake Mead (I assume Blvd, AKA SR 147) to Boulder Highway? I've literally never heard of this before. Where did you hear this from?

Remind me: Which parts of US 6 should remain trunk, and which ones should be reverted to primary again?

Okay, I'll go change them back.

Alright then, I guess I'll restore their old classifications. The only thing I now have against that decision is this: I read somewhere (I think on the wiki) that motorways should not share nodes with other non-motorway (link)s, as that would generate an error. I figured that they should also share nodes with other highways only if they are tagged as an expressway. The original setup has a motorway ending without transitioning into an expressway first, which, it appears, occurs between the interchange at NV 173 and the intersection at Veterans Memorial Drive. Where should this expressway segment be?

You're welcome! I've been hesitating for a bit since its traffic volumes are a little low compared to other primary routes. But, like you mentioned on 5th Street and Lake Mead Blvd, a newly-built neighborhood won't receive much traffic anyway, and a road with relatively few AADT can still be classified as primary if it's the major throughfare of the area. Since you upgraded Fort Apache, I figured it was time. (Hualapai, with a similar AADT for the sections I could find, has no direct freeway connection and doesn't connect to as many amenities.)

Okay... Well, what should be done about the dangling spur? Should this portion of US 93 Business even be considered a motorway at all? IMO, the only thing it has going for itself being a motorway is that it has two grade-separated interchanges. There are no "Freeway entrance" or "Freeway ends" signs anywhere on the route, not even a yellow advisory sign like I-215/Lake Mead Parkway does. What should be done, with all this information in mind?

Alrighty then. I'll change it back.

It's alright! I went ahead and re-added it to the boundary relation.

Hello, why did you downgrade this portion of Lake Mead Parkway to primary? Just west of the intersection is a sign labeled "EXIT ONLY," implying that the road is a freeway rather than an arterial road.

I don't recall deleting any place nodes? The Goodsprings node still exists. Sometimes, there were places nodes and boundary ways that weren't connected via a relation, so I connected them. Other times, a node existed without a boundary (like Nelson), so I created the boundary way. Other times, the boundary existed without a node (like Indian Springs), so I created the node and connected it to the way via a relation. Can you provide specif examples of me deleting place nodes? Once again, I don't remember doing any of that, just defining boundaries and adding them to relations.

Alrighty. The portion between Charleston and Sahara is notably wider than the portion between Sahara and Vegas Valley and traverses residential areas. Plus, if I recall correctly, the bus route portion of Charleston continues onto Sahara for a little bit.

Hello, why did you upgrade Tree Line Drive to secondary? Sloan Lane and Vegas Valley Drive are at least longer and provide an alternate route between Sahara and Desert Inn. But Tree Line Drive is not as wide as the former two and runs through a residential area. Though I was unable to find traffic data for the route, RTC bus route 206 (Charleston) has its eastern terminus at Tree Line Drive. So, what gives? Thanks.

Because "County Road x" (where x is a number) is a highway designation, not an actual name. Sometimes, the county routes have an actual name tagged in their "alt_name," which I used as their actual name.