I've never been to Rhode Island, but the unnamed residential road is not a freeway exit, the quintessential example of a motorway link. It provides direct access to a few houses, which is not something that an on/off ramp would do.

Alright, thank you for answering my question. I have no idea if these roads are signed, but a parcel map from Clark County's OpenWeb shows them as having names. Should I put name:signed=no for the named alleyways?

Okay, thank you very much!

Hello. Why did you remove the letters and numbers from the alleyways? A parcel map of the area shows them as having names (like Alley A or Alley 1). These aren't highway numbers, they're just the names of the alleyways. I hope you understand, and thank you.

Thank you for the explanation. The link you provided does work, but it appears that I have to make an account just to view their images, (If not, it will redirect me to Copernicus). Also, the website says they will retire Sentinel-2 and replace it with Planet Insights, which also needs an account. Unfortunately, my new account is on a free trial of thirty days, so I'd like help if I want to use it in the future.

1. I only moved it 2.90 meters. That's very trivial.
2. I put it precisely at its "mathematical origin" (where the north–south and west–east demarcator meet each other).

I can add the node and boundary to a relation.

I should have been more specific. For example, you labeled the intersection of Lake Mead Blvd and Twilight Run Dr as paved with asphalt, but Clark County's GIS (OpenWeb) still displays it as under construction. Other examples are three track/land-access roads that intersect with the Park Drift Trail, whose intersections you removed. Where did you get the information from? Your changeset doesn't provide a source, so I'm curious to see for myself. Thank you.

Hello. Please do not delete content from city relations. Thank you.

changeset/166899423

Hello. Please do not delete content from city relations. Thank you.

changeset/166899407

Hello, where did you get the sources for those new roads being there? Thanks.

Interesting. I will say that this does come in handy for its northern terminus, as it's oriented west–east and gets renamed to West Ogden Avenue. Is this what you mean by "wayfinding" and "the direction of the road and its location relative to the address grid"?

What do you mean? "In this case, for wayfinding?" Like I said, there is no "North Grand Central Parkway," so what's the point of that?

Hello. Please do not change road names solely based on TIGER data, as it is known to be inaccurate. Furthermore, there is no "North Grand Central Parkway," so there is no need to disambiguate here. Thank you.

changeset/166803741

Because yes, Future I-11 has been signed (at those four signs that I added) and designated by the Arizona DOT.

Here: osm.wiki/MUTCD/W#W19:_End_of_Controlled_Access_Highway
The "FREEWAY ENDS" sign is, indeed, yellow.

Okay. I got these instructions from the wiki, specifically the entry for that yellow "FREEWAY ENDS" advisory sign, which says, word for word, "End highway=motorway at this point."

I used Google Maps Street View because I can't think of any other good, updated street-level imagery source. I'll admit that the street view images of that road are about two years old. Also, what's a GIS, and how can I access it for future reference?

Hey. Please don't arbitrarily retag roads like that. There is an at-grade intersection to the east, meaning it's not a motorway. Thank you.

changeset/166414047

Hello, why did you change the road names and numbers? I used the street signs (on-the-ground rule) for the classification of those roads. There's literally a sign that says "EXPRESSWAY ENDS," so the roadway east of that should not be tagged with highway=motorway.