Or, alternately, does the crossing cross the island or behind it? If so I'll redo it with the crossing over the island

Oh brand new island? If so I'll gladly revert this changeset

Legally you can cycle as far as the signs and that's all that matters. It doesn't matter what you would, should or are meant to do. Bicycle=no means it's illegal to cycle there which is incorrect. It's arguably not irrelevant information where the boundary is, as it's not alien to ride up to the limit, get off and walk the extra to the chippy.

I will go and photograph it IRL next time I'm out and link them

Not here in this instance, I'm just asking generally

What about painted bicycle symbols? They seem to suggest it's legal

But only on outer sides of either crossing?

There is literally nothing to say you can't go from Carnaby Place along the pathway, onto the cycleway, then across the crossing headed for Tankersley Grove. I am mapping the LEGAL extent of where you can cycle. Which is something I thought you cared a lot about

You can legally cycle between the crossings.

+ Trigger Pond & Ace of Hearts shapes

Also moved bus stop nodes, tagged shelter presence, deleted nonexistent ones

If you're gonna add bicycle=no just say it.

^^ Plus standardised access tags to "designated"

Should it be dismount or no? I thought you hated this tag

Whatever, let's get this surveyed with a photo, whichever one of us is there first

The main way in is on West Avenue though?

[I even walked on this bit ;)]

I was there yesterday. Are you basing this off satellite imagery or an IRL survey?

Are they no longer signed one-way? Bearing in mind this is a privately owned highway

Plus some building shapes. Transferred Mulberry Tree to building