Hi, please do not delete admin boundaries in the South China Sea. They represent the de facto territorial situation.

机器翻译：
你好，请不要删除在中国南海管理边界。他们代表了事实上的领土的情况。

Reverted in changeset/36908350. Please read your block message and follow the community import instructions before attempting to import data.

Reverted in changeset/36908350. Please read your block message and follow the community import instructions before attempting to import data.

Reverted in changeset/36782341

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Reverted in changeset/36782152

Hi Walter,
Thanks for getting back to me...it is greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, an article on Spiegel Online is not an OSM-compatible source to derive data from. Unless you refer to a different Spiegel, these changes will have to be redacted. Please see http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms_Summary for more information.

Hi there, I noticed you made these edits but did not list a source. Could you please elaborate on where you obtained this information? I cannot seem to discern any of these features on Bing imagery.

I have removed the coastline because this was added over the coastline/reef you had previously deleted that was already present in the location. I am leaving the airport for now to give you the benefit of the doubt as to the source. Could you please elaborate on it? Thanks, FTA

Hi there,
I noticed you added a few features here with a source of Bing. Unfortunately, the current Bing imagery does not point to an airport feasibly existing at this location. Have you personally visited this airport, or did you acquire this information from a data source that has released its data under compatible terms with OSM's license? Either way, could you in the future include that source with the changeset and use a more meaningful changeset comment? It's hard for fellow mappers to dissect what is being mapped without a description. --FTA