Hi Melb Guy. Just saw your update for Wellington Street with the bike lanes. There are bike lanes already installed on Wellington Street road however I have added cycleway:both:segregated=yes which means we probably don't need lanes you added. I rode it tonight and it really is just a small segregated elevated section. Happy to discuss.

This is in relation to the question asked at https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/12728

Hi DeVries, You added way/425284646 which had the following tags. Is it ok to remove this?
hires = yes
hires:checkdate = 2016-06-16
hires:imagery = Bing

Sources:
Rail
https://twitter.com/DemeryUK/status/1578789556337643521?s=20&t=nfGoSCE_A1soVrbfQ8De1A
Road:
https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1578751246391185408?s=20&t=OKIz9q3XMvhNSeGutOrXHA

Thanks Jomox for the excellent updates. I assume that this section will now alternate between north to south so should the one way be removed for most of the bridge or make it atleast routable from the south? I have no supporting truth for this though, just logic that it's probably more important to get goods to Crimea rather than the other way.

Hi,
The inner lanes south bound appear in tact. Can you please revert your changeset please

Hi, I think the middle two of the four car lanes are still intact

@Jivesas, Merci pour toutes vos modifications! Splendide!

Thanks @Nevw, I noticed this today in a 3rd party app and was going to remove them but you beat me to it.

Well spotted tamism - now fixed. Thanks for the dilligence

Of course there is no issue Ian. This was done a long time ago with lower quality satellite images and you are the doyen of dirt, sultan of surface and governor of gravel. Please make this and any other alteration

Hi, this is a popular shared path and there is nothing stating that cycling is not permitted. Please reinstate this as it is the route I used to go to football training.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120382605

The changeset of paths leading to Macrobertson Bridge allows you to cycle to the Macrob bridge. This should be reinstated as there are no signs preventing you cycling this section off the CCT. The Bridge should be cycle=dismount on the bridge. I am a local and regular user of the CCT and cross the river on a regular basis.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120382941

Sorry, I have noticed that the road has been constructed and appears open - apologies for the previous message.

Hi doublephaeton, Thanks for adding Hughes Place and a few other roads. If they are just on the planning board then it's better to mark these as
highway=proposed
proposed=residential

If works have commenced then use these tags.
highway=construction
construction=residential

I'm not certain of the status of the road but happy to assist if you need and thanks again.

Hi Gregory. I travelled the Great Ocean route walk recently and I couldn't see how to access the shelter at all. Do you know more as there were tracks at all - See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=319721030209808&focus=map&lat=-38.7905212905951&lng=143.6139913661516&z=17 - All the best from from D13

Hi Teek, You added a surface of "wood" to the Base walk south path. Looking at Mapillary, I see this as unpaved way/27444540 - Let us know if you know more but there are no trees here and a wooden platform of this length would be a costly exercise.

Should be Intermittent

Hi Teek, the vast majority of streams and creeks in the centre of Australia are intermittent and rarely have water flowing. Can you please change any you have made or updated to intermittent please. Fabulous mapping but these are dry most of the time.

Hi Teek,
This appears to be spinifex grass and would probably be best described as grassland. I would actually say the entire area is not even grassland but desert as the sands shift over time and are reclaimed - its an on going process. Can you either reduce your excellent mapping to grassland or perhaps consider removing it please? Thanks for reaching out to the road query that I have responded to