Why did you delete the relation/3208300 (San Miguel level-8 boundary)? Was it not valid anymore?

Hello! In this changeset, you deleted nine level-9 boundary relations. Were they invalid? Or did you delete them by mistake? Your changeset comment doesn't say much. Please justify your edit!

Hello, potlatcher! Please be careful when joining or extending ways which are part of relations. You damaged some boundaries. I'm fixing them now.

Another dirty advertiser. Stop it!

Hello, why changing a boundary relation (type=boundary boundary=administrative) into an ordinary multipolygon? Was it not a real boundary?

Hello! Can you please tell more details about this import? I cannot find anything on the talk-id list nor on the forum nor in the Wiki. Are you sure you're following the Import Guidelines?
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Reverted in 34862561. Now you can update nomeação das ruas again, just please don't draw new streets over existing ones.

That's insane, so many streets one over another, each with a different name! I'm reverting this whole bloody mess.

Please avoid drawing overlapping streets, thanks!
What's the editor you're using? Your changeset contains no "created_by" tag.

Why deleting the boundary of Bubaque (relation/1761595)?

Hello, why deleting the suburb "Infanta Isabel" (relation/2114731)? If this is not an error and this administrative entity really ceased to exist, please don't forget to mention it in changeset comment.

@Roger Browne/diary/36175

OK, danke, so dachte ich auch :) Nur hast du hier kein Änderungssatz-Kommentar geschrieben, deshalb sah es auffällig aus. Kein Problem!

Please be careful when joining road segments, they may be parts of boundary relation! You damaged relation/3460706 (boundary of Cerro Signorelli). I'm fixing it now.

May you please name the reason you delete boundary relation/1418160 "Мулянское сельское поселение"? Does it not formally exist anymore? Please do not forget to write changeset comments.

Why did you delete tags
type=boundary and
boundary=administrative
from Yamaguchi's boundary relation? I'm fixing this now. Please respond!

Guten Tag, können Sie bitte sagen, was Sie gerade editieren? In Ihren (mehreren) Änderungen am 23 Oktober haben Sie die Grenzrelation von Bolama fast völlig geleert. Jetzt enthält sie nur drei Wegesegmente:
relation/1761592
Um diese Relation zurückzusetzen, müsste man alle Ihre Änderunden revertieren. Oder können Sie selber reparieren, was Sie kaputt gemacht haben?
Auch weitere Grenzen in Guiné-Bissau sind beschädigt, nach Wambachers Auswertung:
https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/356-countries-compare-2015-10-2

Hello! You deleted the way/363338897, which belonged to the boundary of Ville-Marie. Please be careful.
Fixed in 34821010 (together with some turn restrictions).

Hello! You deleted way/120372467, which was part of 8 important boundary relations. Please be more careful. If you don't understand the purpose of some object, leave it as it is.
Fixed in 34820882.

Vandalism! Reverted in 34747459.