Thank you.

Ok, vielen Dank für die Info.

Good thing I don't know how to play golf. See you around someday!

You seem to like reverting stuff. Would you like to join my secret society? If so, please PM me.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117712263

Hi. Thank you for your contribution.

Are all the buildings you deleted really gone? Does not seem lik that from the aerial imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117724140

Thank you.

I really wonder if the person that did is is asleep right now.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117728264

This never was a good idea.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110238771

Allright, thank you.

nice work, just came in here to say, damn that aerial imagery here looking CRISPPPPP
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117730248

Kinda depends on opinion and regional consensus. Not wrong either way.

Though previous mapper forgot to add cycleway=seperate.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117732736

Thank you, i really dont know what the heck is up with golfers on OSM, currently.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117737811

Mostly good, though it seems some DID exist, being just not residential, but track. Could you please double-check?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748259

bruh, you dont even get paid for this

#2: Thanks for your contributions. Are the deletions of name and destination:ref tags intentional?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748651

Hi Casper,

What a surprise, seeing you here!

This is my first session ever validating stuff using OSMCha. Didn't even realize this was your edit at first, just saw "User has multiple blocks".

I trust you enough to mark this edit GOOD without even checking.

Greets,
Emilius
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117721344

bruh, osmcha reported this for iD instance, mapbox really tryna hide yo iD there, bro
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117734606

No need to apologize, thank you for the quick fix!

Hi,

Good thing on you checking inaccurate data, but could you please draw a new residential landuse, then? An inaccurate one is better than none.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117741634

Hi,

You seem to have deleted the other houses here. Was this intentional?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746022

Not entirely sure if this belongs on OSM, but you do you.

Hi, hope you can understand this,

You seem to be using the deprecated construction=yes. Highways in construction are usally tagged "highway=construction" and "construction=footway" (the value of construction is what the value of highway= would be.)

Thank you for your understanding and your time.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117726836