Hi,

Good thing on you checking inaccurate data, but could you please draw a new residential landuse, then? An inaccurate one is better than none.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117741634

Hi,

You seem to have deleted the other houses here. Was this intentional?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746022

Not entirely sure if this belongs on OSM, but you do you.

Hi, hope you can understand this,

You seem to be using the deprecated construction=yes. Highways in construction are usally tagged "highway=construction" and "construction=footway" (the value of construction is what the value of highway= would be.)

Thank you for your understanding and your time.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117726836

Hi, willkommen. Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.

Erklär mal bitte, was heißt (nicht) "zulässig"? Wenn er nur gesperrt ist, hat er nicht gelöscht zu werden, das lässt sich auch anders kennzeichnen.

Mfg,
Emil
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117728868

ok????????
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117729587

Hi,

Muss der Name vom Energie- und Gewerbepark wirklich so lang sein? Üblicherweise drückt man ehemalige Nutzungen anders in Tags aus.

Mfg,
Emil
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117742650

This seems organized, but just checking in. Is this coordinated? Will these be replaced?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745713

Das gleiche... Warum?????
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745875

Entschuldigung? Was war mit diesen Gärten falsch? Hier hat jemand Arbeit reingesteckt!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745887

Hi. Could you please explain, why you deleted these forests? Was there a reason behind this?

For now, I'm reverting this.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746938

Hi. In the turn relation you have added here, you seem to have forgotten your "from" and "to" members.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747290

wow, groß, bruder.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117744847

cool, bruder.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746089

Hi. Warum machst du das rückgängig? Waren doch schöne Gärten.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117745903

Hi. Ich sehe nicht ganz, was du hier machen wolltest. Das access=private war bereits vorhanden, was ihn eigentlich genug als privat kennzeichnet.

Du hast einfach nur das amenity=parking entfernt, was ihn hier zu einer bedeutungslosen, privaten Fläche macht.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746084

Hi, das sieht soweit so gut aus. Das einzige, was mir auffiele ist, dass du in Colmberg einen Hydranten aufs Feld bewegt hast. War das gewollt? Oder war das ein Versehen?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746272

Hi, danke für deinen Beitrag. Anstatt solche deskriptiven Namen zu vergeben, probier doch mal die access-Tags!

osm.wiki/DE:Key:access
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747079

oh btw, i approve of this. nice work, bro
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747086

Please don't import without consensus on the import. You know how the first Tiger import went.