ElliottPlack's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 131528398 | Hi, thank you for mapping this. I have done some trail mapping in here but was unsure where the MD Trail runs. Do you know of any good reference maps for it (beyond OSM of course)? |
|
| 131114719 | Is that section actually named "Lower Susquehanna Heritage Greenway Trail / Mason-Dixon Trail" with the slash like that? Sometimes folks get a little over enthusiastic about OSM trail naming (I realize you did not assign the name). osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |
|
| 131114719 | Hi there, I see you recently surveyed the lower section of the Mason Dixon trail. The bridge towards the lower end is closed for construction, so I'm curious if that should still be a part of the trail. |
|
| 131125338 | Fixed it for you: changeset/131210571 |
|
| 131125338 | Hi there, please do not name things with a description. The name is for the name only. You can put the opening date in the opening date tag in the name tag. —
|
|
| 119269247 | Uh huh. This is a street complete edit. Are you familiar with app? |
|
| 130611511 | Hi there Trail Runner, While we all appreciate your dedication to trail mapping, this sort of renaming of the C&O by milepost is a violation of the OSM policy that "Names are Names Only". See below. You need to correct these names immediately, to whatever they were before. This edit split the path into dozens of unneeded segments to break it up by milepost too. That is unnecessary and adds a lot of clutter to the database, such as for the management of the plethora of relations that use this route. The more I look at this, the more it looks like a full revert of this and the other C&O changeset may be warranted. Please help me understand what inspired you to name the trail this way and if there are any others that have been named this way. Thank you, --
|
|
| 126516519 | Yes, there’s a photo of it on the wiki, the one with the giant “NO” |
|
| 130677493 | Sent a warning via this block osm.org/user_blocks/6717 |
|
| 64271732 | Hi there Mykol404. I didn't see an entry for these parking lots in the osm.wiki/Import/Catalogue Could you provide us with any documentation on this import, e.g., discussions with other mappers, a source dataset, a wiki page, etc.?
|
|
| 115580480 | Hi there, Please don’t invent access tags for roads on military bases. This causes problems for data consumers that interpret OSM data. access=military has no definition on the OSM wiki. Private access means that the general public is not allowed. That is certainly the case at NSA / Meade. Thanks for understanding, Elliott Plack
|
|
| 129879062 | Hi there, welcome to the OSM project. I see you requested a review. These edits look good at first glance. What inspired you to try your hand at lane editing? |
|
| 121311617 | nice work here. Can you take a look at the LL 93 relations? The part up on Warren Road seems to be missing. Not broken by you or in this changeset, just a general note. |
|
| 120368631 | Looks good |
|
| 120997675 | Nice, I am surprised many of these were not mapped already. |
|
| 130581919 | as you may know, some folks are contesting the addition of this sauna. If it is unauthorized, should it be access=yes? |
|
| 130018058 | Thanks! This is about the project. It may open this week but I'm relying on others for solid ground survey https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/dot-dte/projects/whiteflintww/index.html |
|
| 130018058 | Hi there, this road is still closed/under construction. It is supposed to be opening soon. |
|
| 127681284 | Done! changeset/130337582 |
|
| 127681284 | Peter, Thanks for your patience in my reply! I think you are right that this historic=boundary_stone is the better option here. I can change all of them. |