I've removed this as you've drawn it over a house, so can't be in the correct place.

I think the road signs only permit them to drive to their homes from Via Urbis Romanae. They can cycle, walk, taxi or bus from the other side. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/cBX_-mVnzh_Jk_Gm0a8FNw

Hi Chris, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm going to change Green Lane back to a track, which is what it is physically. It also has the designation=public_footpath tag on it to mark that it is a public footpath - I'm not sure how clear that is in iD editor that you used. Any questions let me know. Best wishes. Ed

Can you not make changes based on aerial imagery, please? This former farmland has been earmarked for housing, hence the greenfield tags. I'll put them back

Quite a few are slightly off, even

Switching to cycle map layer (for contours) it looks like many are, and some are slightly off. Source originally was one of these layers: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/VectorAndMapData#Public_Domain_CIA_Maps

I'll blame the new version of Vespucci. Thanks for letting me know - I'll watch out for it happening in future.

Hi there. I notice you've changed the name of St Andrew's Avenue to Clingoe Hill (which was already tagged as an alternative name in the alt_name I think, e.g. way/327609649/history ). Has the road name been officially changed? The only street name signs I was aware of are those at the bottom of the hill where the dual carriageway meets the roundabout(s).

Quite possibly. One of my earlier attempts at editing using Vespucci and it looks like I amended from shop=alcohol to shop=bistro to worry about later (then forgot). I've changed it to a restaurant until I'm next out that way to check whether café might be more suitable.

I wish I had more time for doing edits. Not so much the editing itself, but collecting the data first. It would be great for example if all the shops in Colchester were mapped so if the Gazette run a story similar to "shop x has opened where shop y was" it would be a simple matter to update. I suspect for example we should retag W&G as Fenwick(s?)...

There's efficient - the Gazette reports that Taco Bell opens today and I went to see if the former Fabric 8 shop was mapped.

Also, has "The Filling Station" become "Beatles" - the FHRS data extract from yesterday suggests not?

Hi. I noticed your edit and thought maybe you'd like to also set "Allowed Access" to private as well as (or perhaps instead of) the name. This will cause the "P" shown on the standard rendering to be paler than public car parks.

Hi Patrick, Are you sure that the cafe is in this unit, and this cafe hasn't taken the place of the Sea Breeze cafe next door? (and next door to that the microbrewery has now moved, so thanks for the reminder I need to untag that...)

You have access to plans other than the copyright ones that are part of the planning application?

Then how have you surveyed the house numbers?

Hi. Are these houses really built already? When I last passed the ground was just about cleared but I don't think they'd even got foundations in.

Does this need to be two relations? If so should 6013575 also include way way/400633328 like 6016446 does?

So should the amenity=place_of_worship tag across the road be on the whole of the church grounds rather than just the building?

The wiki suggests that amenity=pub should go on the node *or* the building. "If the whole building is used for this feature and its footprint is present in OSM, you can apply the tags on the area if you prefer" which is different to schools. amenity=pub