Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179240 : "Наименование: Серебряный пруд". Please, stop multiply changing of names.

Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179243 : "Наименование: пруд Рубаха Наполеона". Please, stop multiply changing of names.

You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.

You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.

You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.

As I remember, I've already told, that "stable" in joint projects doesn't mean "ideal" or "the best": it means "version before active controversy". If this "bullshited" version existed long time, it will be not a big deal if it is around few weeks more in such state during discussion. If we say, that multiply edits of hundreds of objects during a few days with name changing and without preliminary discussion is normal, we will make base unstable. Banishment of opponent from project is not a solution, the solution is desire of finding consensus. Please, describe your problems with importing from OSM for finding appropriate algorithms/tags.

see comments here: changeset/62103990

see comments here: changeset/62103990

see comments here: changeset/62103990

see comments here: changeset/62103990

see comments here: changeset/62103990

see comments here: changeset/62103990

Your hypothesis seems to be incorrect: there are waterbodies in rgis base with names which don't contain "type object" words. In any case, these two sources don't contradict each other: both of them say about "Итальянский пруд", not "Французский пруд" or "Английский пруд".

Please, describe the problem with this edit.

You comments writing programm may be corrected: I've already gave comment about this object: changeset/62103990.

Please, stop suppressing waterbodies names. You can easily check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179185 . Наименование: "Итальянский пруд".

Здравствуйте! Прошу Вас высказаться по поводу тегирования строек: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63226 . Существуют разные точки зрения о том, как следует заносить в базу информацию о том, что происходит за строительным забором. Вероятно, до установления единого стандарта имеет смысл не удалять из тега name информацию, занесённую туда другими редакторами.

Артём Крюковский, are planning to give answers or you are just planning to write comments to me in automatic mode? I've asked you to cancel your automatic edits of hundreds of waterbodies and start discussion essentially. My insignificant manual reverts to stable versions of objects are a drop in the bucket. It is normal situation in joint projects, when objects are reverted to stable versions during discussions. And I ask you once more: please, describe the problems with you OSM-origin base. I think, it can be solved not but cutting OSM-base, but by normal post-processing during import.

Please, describe the problem with this edit.

See comments here: changeset/61766931