Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverted in 119151901 - this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Reverting this edit based on questionable licensing status of notes from anonymous, per Discord conversation. road names appear unable to be sourced with licensed data.

Hi MapAnalyser,

What is your reasoning from changing these roads back into motorway_links? They don't appear to meet the criteria for a link roads: they aren't sliproads but are important roads in their own right.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119144105

Hey Paul,

Interesting that LASSI shows The Crescent; would probably be worth reaching out to the council to clarify it :)

Dian

Hey Via Velo.

When I changed the name of this road to "Beach Road", I confirmed with local street signs that the name of the road had changed, and that it is "Formerly" The Crescent.

Hello MapAnalyser.

It is incorrect to map each turn lane with a separate highway where there is no physical separation.

There are not three separate roads here. I will the unnecessary roads accordingly.

Hey Oscar,

Thanks for your contributions here. :)

I noticed that you converted a parking aisle on the rooftop of the shopping centre to an escalator/steps (786055966) was that intentional?

Also, quick tip in case you weren’t aware: you can use the ‘Q’ key to make the corners of building square. It saves me a lot of time and makes the angles nice and perfect.

Dian
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118113177