Hello!

No. I meant to check on it when I got home actually as I thought I'd already numbered it the other day.

I've tagged it as nohousenumber=yes and kept addr:flats - hopefully that keeps Street Complete happy!

Thanks for the reminder!

Thanks :)
Needs an in-person survey to get some extra detail, but slowly making the map better!

Hello! Thanks for letting me know!

Fixed in changeset/167020706

Thanks for updating the tagging!

Nope! Thanks for flagging.
I was clearly not zoomed in enough in Street Complete and thought it was referring to the bin in the entrance foyer!
I've reverted in changeset/164265403

I've split these into individual hoops in changeset/160790569. I can't find the location of the 7th from my photos though.

Hey, I was the one who added this.
I'm not sure the best way to map this as it isn't really a formal court, just a load of hoops on the outside of the asphalt area.
Not a great image, but here is a photo I took while surveying last year https://photos.app.goo.gl/YwZyNBNNgzE6sGCBA

:)
A lot of trees causing annoying shadows on the imagery though. I need to get out to do more surveys!

I think it's fine. I was debating between roof:shape=many and roof:shape=gabled. I went for gabled in the end, but can be split into building parts later to be more accurate. I think I just messed up setting the tags in JOSM!

Hi :)
Thanks. I removed it because I saw no evidence of cycling being permitted on Mapillary at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.0693473446&lng=-2.8013698404&z=11.904412871082933&pKey=2604328053198219&focus=photo&x=0.48816258946850666&y=0.5252273468605346&zoom=0 but missed the connection at the top end.
I think I've fixed it by adding a link from the end of the cycle section to the old Lancaster Road in changeset/156142683
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156139365

I suspect that the issue is that some pedestrian footways are not connected to the rest of the network.
If you take a look for example at the junction of North Drive and County Avenue, the only route for a pedestrian is around the back of a recycling/ cycle shed. Presumably though the pedestrians can cross straight across the entrance of County Avenue.
Presumably something like crossing=unmarked and the associated tags would need to be added across the entrance of this junction, and others

Looks good, thanks :)

Hey, it's a detached house that has been converted into three flats (there's a few that have been converted to flats on that road, but it was raining, so didn't make a note of most!).

Good call, thank you. I've updated it as suggested

I have just re-checked my photographs of the area from when I surveyed in October.

I personally think it /ought/ to be landuse as it is man-made and not naturally occurring, and that is echoed by some discussions on the wiki and the rejected proposal of natural=shrubbery - osm.wiki/w/index.php?oldid=2130624

I would say that the wiki description for natural=shrubbery fits what we have here, although it has never been accepted as a proposal.

It was probably a mistake on my part to tag as landuse=shrubbery when natural=shrubbery is better documented, but as there is no consensus on the correct tagging yet I would be inclined to leave it for now.