kissing gates, by default, are unsuitable for bike riding.

OSMR should be aware of any cycling relations & prioritize accordingly.

So you're add both bicycle yes & no tags?!
OSMR doesn't sound like a capable piece of software
As OSM is geospatially aware, OSMR & all 3rd party software should be able to adapt to specific countries

This is clearly a problem within the router, not OSM. Please contact OSMR to resolve this limiting feature, instead of adding unnecessary tags.

Hi
What router do you believe requires the bicycle=yes tag?

Any chance you can sort out this internal building mess. You've created at least three entities, none of which align.

Hi
Why have you deleted all the shops at Craddocks Ave?
Why do your selective replacement shops correspond exactly to those listed on Google Maps? (you can't copy GM's data)
Why have you removed car park polygons ?

Hi
These Qs apply to many of your changeset edits:
Why have you deleted the more detailed, accurate polygon platforms only to replace them with single ways?
Why have you deleted a train station building & a landuse=railway area?
Why have you duplicated railway=station tags
Why have you deleted valid railway=station nodes?
Why have you added building=8 tags to areas which clearly aren't buildings?

Hi
Labels of villages are often placed externally so they don't block detailed information.

Hi
Did you mean this to be commercial? Better a highway=service, area=yes?
If the buildings are offices a 'commercial' area should be drawn to the extent of the whole grounds (& realign the residential area)

Hi
There was no misunderstanding. I was asking why you deleted the valid tag 'footway'. It is being encouraged to not use 'path' as it's usage is inconsistent & confusing (as borne out by its wiki page. All attributes of a path described on that page should be included as sub-tags to 'footway'). The major renderings make no distinction between them.

Why have you removed 'cycleway' from ways that are designated bicycle routes?

Hi
is there a reason you've removed the footway tag?
way/191261916

Hi
You've removed a couple of sections from NCN 4. Could you revise please:
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=1318930

You've also removed major parts of EV1:
relation/2763769
Please restore.

This, & other iD 'validations' are very worrying
The correct tagging for crossing with painted white stripes is:
highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled (if it hasn't any vehicle restricting lights)
crossing_ref=zebra

I note this was performed in around 30 seconds. I don't use iD. Is it possible to collect data together for a mass edit similar to how it can be done in JOSM?

Please stop ignoring the solutions you've been provided with.

@skquinn

Your basing your argument on one piece of antiquated software. There were no edits in Houston so your last sentence is contradictory as it's self evident "that it can't be done using the history button."

I didn't create this entity (check history). What do the signs/website say?

@skquinn
This is a failure to not update the way osm.org displays changeset data. It isn't a valid reason to not correct spelling errors. Please use the other, more detailed validation software listed*
This is an Overpass Turbo query which lists all edits around Houston, excluding yours: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JlI

Please remember the goal is to improve the map quality. All else is secondary.

* There's also http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/ but it appears to be down ATM. Hopefully it'll be resurrected.

There are more validating sites than this one. Please use them.

Adjudication of edits should be performed on quality not quantity.

How has this changseset been detrimental to the OSM database?

way/691952101

I don't think this is a looped road. It#s two separate roads leading to individual houses.