DaveF's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 65061300 | That the was previously one word + all the other evidence suggests the signwriters messed up & still sways it to one word IMO. I'll put the two word version in the alt_
|
|
| 65061300 | Hi
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=metro+centre http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Ebs http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/timesandfares/MCE/BLO/041218/1015/dep http://naptan.app.dft.gov.uk/datarequest/help Please publish your evidence it's two words. |
|
| 65031668 | You could have used the 'straight ahead only' rule. 4 rels instead of 8. |
|
| 64973426 | Open to persuasion, but they have separate CRS & NapTAN codes, their own entrance & run a separate service to the main concourse. |
|
| 64710679 | Thanks |
|
| 64710679 | Hi
Cheers
|
|
| 63800817 | I've reverted both changesets |
|
| 64742085 | Hi
Cheers
|
|
| 63800817 |
Has all this & surrounding area become residential? |
|
| 64421224 | Please don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer. if it's a kissing gate it needs to be tagged as such. The OSM database is rendered in many different way, some of which show kissing gates.
|
|
| 64227458 | Hi
|
|
| 63609968 | That maybe the new name of the company, but not the lettering of the signage. You've got ahead of yourself. |
|
| 63556054 | Does the tagging, as is, excludes taxis? |
|
| 63536898 | Hi
|
|
| 62793152 | How can cul-de-sacs be oneway? Please stop fantasy mapping |
|
| 62793049 | Hello Welcome to OSM & all that, but this is utter rubbish. Please map responsibly. |
|
| 59988320 | Entropy - more items = more maintenance. The "inexperienced" often mistake MP's & add tags to their ways, creating errors in rendering. I'm struggling to see how drawing & tagging one single polygon way is less work than mapping lots of individual ways, splitting an existing polygon into multiple ways, creating two MP relations, adding them to all the ways & then deleting tags from the existing polygon. |
|
| 44811485 | Hi
|
|
| 52955672 | Hi Paul
Are you aware of the discussions on Talk-GB where it was agreed that only fhrs:id & address data was to be added? Transient info, such as rating, rating date would result in unnecessary maintenance. fhrs:authority is irrelevant as OSM is geospatially aware.
|
|
| 52955672 | What is "dontimport:fhrs:addrline1" used for? |