OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
50104323

Hi Cate91 Welcome to OSM.
I'm reverting a couple of your edits as you've removed a tag & overlaid a new highway instead of upgrading the existing way.

Is Cherry Banks fully open to Forgetmenot Way?

50055007

Hi
Wouldn't it benefit OSM if, instead of removing semi-inaccurate tags, to update them to their correct values?

49928620

Hi
By "too prominent" are you referring to how it renders on the standard map? If so, could you reinstate it please.

If it exists it can be mapped. If you feel the rendering isn't to your liking you can discuss it in the relevant forum: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues.

49674010

BTW Welcome to OSM.

I've never found an official name, which is why I never named it. I see it more as a leisure=recreation_ground than a park. It certainly shouldn't be tagged as both.

How about 'Manor Road Playing Fields'? http://sports-facilities.co.uk/sites/view/6001121

49680195

Allow me to correct myself. It is in the pub's garden & EH have located it in the wrong place

49680195

Hi
Is there a reason you moved The Cove's location?
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stanton-drew-circles-and-cove/history-and-research/

49674010

Hi
Could you provide your source for the name please.

49526098

Please refrain from adding not existing features. As noted previously there's a likelihood they'll be removed, which would be a waste of your time. Note comment about historical data: osm.org/welcome.html

49401905

Hi
Who did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

I've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of contributing to OSM. It's a bit vague, but they appear to have their own database. Could you contribute to that?

49401905

Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags.
Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks.

49428345

And you are obviously an inexperienced OSM mapper. It is not just for anglers information. Please read up on how to map accurately: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6/how-do-i-get-started-with-openstreetmap

49428345

Have you thought about mapping the actual fishing sites instead of the irrelevant 'access' notes?

49401905

Hi Syvanne
Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add?
Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped.
OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: osm.wiki/Open_Historical_Map

49206152

FYI area tag isn't required for man_made=bridge

49055920

Hi Mike
This appears misplaced.

49054597

Hi

note/1012159

49048118

OK.
Are the grounds for the sole use of Sheldon or shared with Hardenhuish?

49048118

Hi ~Jack
Other than being 'temporary' is there a reason for the pitch deletions? These are allowed as they're seasonal & return in Autumn. If there's a cricket pitch that can be mapped so it overlaps other pitches:
osm.org/#map=18/51.42953/-2.19274

Is this a public recreation ground or part of the adjacent school?

48790591

Hi
You're not sounding rude.

You've changed multiple items from tags that represent farms to tags that do not represent farms, purely to, by your own admission, "get the farm’s name on the map rendering". This absolutely is 'tagging for the renderer'.

Although landuse=farm isn't fully accurate, it's better than place=farm which is not a farm.
To remove landuse=farm from the database (which is the intention of these edits) it would be more accurate to replace nodes with this tag to landuse=farmyard, which is what the vast majority of these are, even though they're nodes not polygons.

48790591

Hi
"to get at least the farm’s name on the map rendering," < This is tagging for the render & is to be discouraged. Mapnik carto is just one of many renderings.

By changing from landuse=farm to place=farm you made the OSM database more inaccurate - you made a tag which represents a farm to something which isn't a farm.

If you "have no means to decide whether it’s still a real farmyard" then you should not have made the amendments en bloc.

Is there a wiki page explaining the 'NoFarm' clear up?