Hi
What is the "2 bridges cycle path"?
I can find no references to it.

The relation/5389238 needs merging with the original NCN 33 route relation/76059.

It all looks a bit of a mess.

The 'Pier to Pier' route requires its own relation.

There was already a railway=station tag:node/21275502

Hi
What documentation do you have regarding the decision of the PROW? BANES still list it as a TBC.

Hi

Please don't delete valid PROWs
way/162848989

Creating a MP relation with two outers is unnecessary.
relation/17729757

Hi
Please don't add 'Platform' to the ref tag, it should just be the number/letter.

Hi
You've attached the Southern end of this platform to the railway line:
way/28929703

You've unnecessarily split a bridge & subway in two,

way/1257815532

way/1257815533

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=148249796

Hi
You've left a duplicate undeleted. it has relations attached which will require transferring.

way/140777120

Hi
Are these stations open to the public?

Hi
The platforms were fine as they were.
You unnecessarily split each platform, when in reality they pass under the roof.
You've also unnecessarily added duplicating platforms as liner ways.

Please revert all relevant changesets.

Please add more descriptive changeset comments than "edits".

Hi Please don't remove area tags from platforms as there's a bug in OSM-Carto which can prevent it from rendering correctly.

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
FYI there was already a railway=station object.. I've made appropriate amendments to the train station building & node.
changeset/151391310

Aargh... I made the poor assumption that the incorrect key held the incorrect value, but it appears "326/4" is the correct value & "Radley FP 4" is the made up one. Will revert & redo.

OSM should /not/ be making up their own. RW, or you, wouldn't dream of altering the refs for motorways or A roads, so it's beyond comprehension why you perceive it to be acceptable for PROWs.

Hi
Welcome to OSM.
node/5866078584/history
There is already a railway=station tag.
railway=stop is the valid tag.

Hi
I really think there should only be one prow_ref tag. Duplicating only causes more confusion.
Looking at Cornwall's database it's clear the values you added to the 'official' tag are the correct ones & should be transferred to 'prow_ref'

Please don't change the well used & documented prow_ref tag to prow_ref:official

or destination even?

hgv designated?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/4235262

https://maps.app.goo.gl/hk2ve3CWJmcVXDUY6

Hi
way/1279782238
You can't have tunnels & bridges.

layer is a rendering tag. the bridge has +1 value so the path doesn't require a layer tag.