Hi
Is the name in this & other paths you amended actually the PROW reference?
Would be better using the prow_ref tag instead?

Hi
On the premise 'OSM shouldn't be a database dump', what is the purpose of your additions such as heritage & heritage:operator?

@HellMap (and @tux67 & Carnildo)
So, by your own admission Your argument is straw man. *All* of the errors were in existence prior to these edits. These edits created no errors. The only reason you've become aware of these errors & thnk MapComplete is a solution to fixing them is due to edits occurring. Discussing them before hand wouldn't have enlightened you. If there are errors, fix them; instead of moaning about other edits which improve the quality of the OSM database.

@ZeLonewolf
As the edits haven't created errors, only tidied up deprecated tags that have already been discussed at length, what's your logic for "getting mad"? Communities should assess on quality, not quantity.

Auto/bot/mechanical edits amend one tag on one type of object. If (& it's a big if) there are amendments to other objects they stand out like sore thumbs. edits are much more likely to be erroneously missed where a contributor changes multiple tags on multiple different objects, even if it's only over a small area.

It's disappointing to see OSM is attracting people who are not really interested in its primary purpose of providing *accurate* data to create maps, but just here to 'manage the process'.

Please remember this anti mass edit ruling was created, in a display of blatant 'do as we say, not as we do' arrogance, by those who oversaw the crap Tiger import in the US & yet couldn't be bothered to fix it.

Excellent.
As it's serving two tracks should the platform be split in two? Ref=1. ref=2?

@aTarom
What was wrong with this edit by
way/174925279/history

What do you mean by "By size or by name"?

-----------------
OSM should be assessing edits based on quality, not quantity. These edits by avinet_ua fix n tag approved for deprecation.

It appears a few contributors are replying purely to try & look important rather than improve the OSM database, which just a waste of time & effort.

Hi
The bridge is the full width of the river.
way/1175264609#map=19/51.45278/-2.58448

The detach your paths from this object:
way/661120261#map=19/51.45285/-2.58422

Hi
How can this be a culvert?
way/1175265372#map=19/51.45290/-2.58445

Hi
way/1175264606

Is this really a tunnel or a building_passage? What does it join to?

Values equating to 'no' are not required as the legal status of the ways defines which transport modes can access them.

Hi
The UK are using hall_of_residence for student accommodation. Please don't amend any others.

To check - Are there any bollards at this location?

I'm unclear what your point is. Could you clarify with more detail.

AFAICS I amended tags:
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#106206912

And you moved it:
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#135693790

Hi
way/44633351
Please don't change ways from their official designated alignment.

Please don't add names of routes onto the ways. They're mapping in route relations.

Hi
Is there a reason you split these two ways?
way/23963284
way/1166209746#map=18/51.46740/-2.48798

Hi
All railway=stations are tagged as nodes. I've converted your polygons to landuse=railway.

Good
Saves me double checking
.

Is the google image your source for the change, if so copy right prevents OSM from using their data?

The image is over two years old.

Hi
To check - Did you get this info from updated road signs?

Hi
Why have you bumped up Whiteway Rd's speed limit to 50mph?