DaveF's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 132685922 | Hi
|
|
| 132604631 | Hi
The boundary appears a bit more detailed/wibbly-wobbly compared with the Authorities map. |
|
| 132316479 | My query stemmed from this article:
If you've local knowledge, adding it would be great. Does 'Hillside' join into Enterprise? |
|
| 132533920 | Please learn how to revert complete changesets using JOSM instead of adding new ways. It destroys the entity's true history. |
|
| 132529871 | This is /not/ a McColl's. The fact I corrected it just yesterday should have been a clue.
How many others are in your changeset? |
|
| 132472883 | Why have you removed these planters? Only make edits for which you have up to date data.
Please redact. |
|
| 132434586 | Hi
Do you know if they a different company in the Walcot St building? If it's empty the defined way to tag it is to prefix it's name & office tags with 'disused:'
|
|
| 132315124 | Got you - Thanks. |
|
| 132315124 | Why have you removed this kissing gate? |
|
| 132132242 | Is the imagery you used available as a website/slippy map? |
|
| 131981249 | Hi
|
|
| 131707625 | "This thing, literally, does not appear on the map..." |
|
| 131268236 | I stated my reasons for not using it in my original post.
Another user created the request stop wiki page. I added the link to it from the halt page. "a phrase I feel is wholly inaccurate."
|
|
| 131387598 | Hi
|
|
| 122550105 | Hi
|
|
| 131387598 | Please do not attached ways going under bridges to those bridges. They are at different levels.
You've duplicated a stile node.
Do not split ways unless there is a difference in tags
You've created 3 spurious/duplicating kissing gates & unnecessarily split an access land polygon
Similar here
and here:
Do you have a reason why this changeset shouldn't be reverted? |
|
| 131387598 | Hello again
Have these two PROWs refs been removed from BathNES's database & has the route been officially realigned?
Is there a reason you've split this into an individual way?
Has this PROW been officially realigned?
What's wrong with this footway?
|
|
| 131387598 | Hi Are you sure this is a public footpath? It doesn't have a PROW reference. Please don't use highway=path. It was created by people who didn't understand the highway hierarchy. Use 'footway' instead. There's no requirement to explicitly add motor_vehicle=no etc as 'footway' automatically excludes modes other than walking. Have these paths been removed?
Bottom of path:
On the path looking down at Serpentine Lake
At top of path looking back at car park:
|
|
| 131397967 | ||
| 131397967 | Hi
Please amend to this:
|