OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
56537903

I think waiting until the road is "operational" is probably the way to go, in the absence of a survey/other evidence. Better to err on the side of not including roads, rather than including non-existent roads. A lot of "open" roads seem to be boundary cases; they exist at their final alignment, but they aren't yet paved, and they have the feel of being construction sites. Someone directed to take them by routing software may well be unhappy.

56537903

Jerome Jodoin Drive is not open (yet), based on my survey on Sunday, although there is a track following the future roadway. I think highway=construction is the best description at this point.

56338594

Hi Matthew,
I somehow missed the address file in the Ottawa Open Data portal, since it is not in the geography&maps group. Thanks for pointing that out. I agree that the addresses should be on Clenning.

56341843

changeset comment should be "added government office in Attawapiskat"

56338594

Hi Matthew,
An address on Clenning Street makes more sense. I've corrected the addresses. What is your source, by the way? GeoOttawa shows the units as part of 16 Kilbarron.

55414061

Actually the source was Esri World Imagery

50781781

Hi Matthew,
Isn't Épinettes Avenue generally known as Des Épinettes Avenue, not Épinettes Avenue? All Google search results seem to be for Des Épinettes, the bus stops are named Des Épinettes, the street signs/geoOttawa call it av. des Épinettes Av. (see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/91NzZ8NiMm1AECSVlLBmOA). In all cases, the "des" is part of the name (somewhat ambiguously in the case of geoOttawa). Similar streets nearby also have "des" as part of the name (e.g. "Des Chouettes Lane", "Des Perdrix Crescent").
Danny M

53494760

This edit appears to have broken the 162 bus route relation.
The problem is that if you
1. download a way into JOSM without downloading any referring relations
2. split the way
Any referring relations will only contain one of the split ways, not both. For a route relation, this will create a gap.

This is a known bug in JOSM (see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4142). I only found out about it after breaking several relations myself (including the Canada relation).

By the way, this sidewalk tagging is great.

53428253

Google Streetview has photos with the Carol Todd name. I'd be interested in seeing what the city says about it.

53428253

@Matthew Darwin, the (post-amalgamation) street signs clearly indicate Carol Todd Drive, not Caroltodd Drive. There are uses of both names online. I'd be inclined to go with the on-the-ground name, not the city database name. The address points and the French name could be changed for consistency.

53028587

walter,
I didn't get any JOSM warnings (about broken boundaries). I think the problem was that I split a way without downloading all relations that that way belongs to. The new way created should be added to any unloaded relations, but JOSM doesn't do this, or even let you know there is any problem, even if you later download a broken relation. If you download a way, JOSM should also download all relations that the way belongs to.

52961631

I'm not going back and reviewing each individual deletion. Most of the nodes I deleted were duplicates, but the tags were usually OK. I didn't delete node/5158425038, just relocated it.

52996835

OK, I'll wait until things settle down.

52250595

Hi walter,
I accidentally broke Unorganized North Cochrane+Cochrane District when adding Greenstone. Thanks for catching this.
Danny

51987433

How did this edit undelete the duplicate Espanola?