OpenStreetMap
CycleStreets's Notes
Notes submitted or commented on by CycleStreets
| Id | Creator | Description | Created at | Last changed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 795698 | CycleStreets | This long path is marked as a 'Service road'. Is that correct? Il s'agit d'une «route de service». Est-ce correct? |
|||
| 316067 | CycleStreets | New footpath needs review. Added in path but not clear whether this is legally cycleable or not, and surface and width would be useful to add. |
|||
| 234669 | Richard | Cycle Superhighway (CS2x) is currently mapped with on-road tracks (cycleway=track) which is a suboptimal solution. Should be replaced with a separate highway=cycleway to recognise segregated nature of route. |
|||
| 780521 | CycleStreets | This section has some contradictory tagging - it says bicycle=yes but access=private. As a result, routes are showing up like this:
|
|||
| 641217 | CycleStreets | Need to check cycle tracks at these two junctions due to the construction work. |
|||
| 715082 | CycleStreets | This is marked as access=destination, meaning it is not possible as a through route for bicycles from the main road to the cycleway. Is that correct? Dies wird als access=destination markiert, was bedeutet es für Fahrräder von der Hauptstraße zum Fahrradweg nicht möglich, da eine durchgehende Strecke ist. Ist das richtig? |
|||
| 641214 | CycleStreets | Does this bridge now have segregated lanes on? |
|||
| 567539 | CycleStreets | There is a pedestrian exit somewhere round here, as per this photo: |
|||
| 567541 | CycleStreets | Ditto, link somewhere near here. |
|||
| 641220 | CycleStreets | Should this back street really be considered highway=service? |