We understand there is cycle parking in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery.

We understand there is cycle parking in this general area but have been unable to locate it from the available imagery.

We understand there is cycle parking in this area but have been unable to see it on the aerial imagery.

We understand there is cycle parking around here but cannot see it from the aerial imagery.

Is there connectivity here for walking (or cycling also)? The aerial imagery appears to suggest some kind of bridge.

Is cycling permitted across Kinsey Road? There is a cycleway either side shown.

The western end of: way/887360198/history

is marked as: access=forestry which denies biking.

This means, for instance, that routability is not possible from Northwest Express to Yabba Dabba Doo, as the short connection between these is denying biking.

access=* gives the example of access=forestry, foot=permissive as an example of where access=forestry should be combined with another access-related tag.

So should that, and the other forestry tracks in this area, have bicycle=yes added? At the very least, it seems implied that that very western end should have this.

Should this footway have bicycle=yes? The path by the cafe has bicycle=yes and there is a cycle park here.

Sollte dieser Fußweg bicycle=yes haben? Der Weg am Cafe hat bicycle=yes und hier gibt es einen Fahrradpark.

Hobson's Conduit relation needs to continue north from here