Do not add non-existent features to the map purely for a silly golf game. All of your edits have been reverted, as your actions are not in line with OSM guidelines.

Google Earth/Maps is not an acceptable source for OSM due to licensing.

"q" can be used to square the buildings.

Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770192

Do not add then delete features to the map just to export it to your little golf game. You should perform the edits offline using JOSM, this way you do not damage other features on the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770289

This changeset should be reverted due to it being a low quality "import". The buildings are not square and do not align with the buildings themselves on aerial imagery (rotated) and/or do not match the shape of the house. It is clear that this import was not manually reviewed as stated in the note, and likely was not discussed beforehand.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

Same thing here... Multipolygon Relation should be used instead.

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Same thing as the other comment I left you. Please use a multipolygon relation to add "holes" to an area. The manner in which you did it is not correct.

Refer here for more info, and reach out if you have questions:
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Do not do "holes" in an area in the manner in which you have. This is not correct. A relation should be used instead to punch out (or exclude) an inner area of a feature.

This area and others have been updated accordingly to follow OSM best practices.

There is a vineyard tag. Do not use the name to add descriptive information. Just use the right tags...

Well, you clearly did a lot. What did you change and why?

Here's a good guide you should look over:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147254

What source did you use?

You can use "q" to square the buildings.

They deleted items in:
changeset/133145661

I wasn't able to revert it, but did report to DWG.

They also haven't provided good changeset comments.

A user went through and deleted a lot of these roadways in this changeset and others in:

changeset/133145661

I tried reverting, but the revert site had an issue. Not sure why. Maybe you can help sort it out. I'm reporting user to DWG as well.

Please do not delete items without providing a justification and explanation in the changeset comments. This changeset is being reverted.

Ok, so unsure at least. That's fine.
Just had to ask!

Please use better changeset comments. "r" tells me nothing. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144293

Please use more descriptive changeset comments. What did you change, and why?

"faf" tells me absolutely nothing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133144928