Do not remove features that actually exist.

These edits were added by user:
@combdaddy

User has been referred to DWG.

Do you have a source and timeline for these "proposed" changes?

You could always just change the end bit to a driveway and set "Access=private"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132562117

These should all remain mapped but instead be tagged as "Access=private". This type of information is invaluable to first responders.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132606244

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
osm.wiki/Changeset_comment
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132853909

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
osm.wiki/Changeset_comment

Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why?

Refer here for more info:
osm.wiki/Changeset_comment

1) Please use better changeset comments. What did you change and why?

2) Please only map what is actually there. ie - no double upping of routes for the renderer/golf game.
way/1148348174

This item still has a water tag. It should remain. I have added it back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132844646

Buildings can be squared using "q"

Do not map for temporary reasons. Only things that actually exist should be added and maintained on the map. Adding just to remove fictitious features does not belong on OSM.

Reverted in:
changeset/132814518

Please do not change ponds into water hazards when they are not on a golf course.

Changeset reverted in:
changeset/132814445
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132813472

Why did you change ponds into water hazards when they are not part of a golf course?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132813472

I'm not sure why the features were added and named "Player"... This is not correct.

Not sure why user=JriSv250 rated this as bad? All edits are valid.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98150781

As mentioned previously....

Please take the time to leave better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Refer here if you have questions: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comment
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132786731

As mentioned previously....

Please take the time to leave better changeset comments. What did you change and why? Refer here if you have questions: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comment
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132786793