CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 132008137 | Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do? |
|
| 132095585 | Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do? |
|
| 132223399 | Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do? |
|
| 132274544 | Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do? |
|
| 132029327 | Please map it how it is, and not how you need/want it for a game. This database is for legitimate uses and not video games. |
|
| 132029327 | Is there a reason you deleted all these golf course holes?
|
|
| 130809901 | Same thing here and for the rest of your edits. The Tee, Green, Fairway, etc. should not be named, especially if they are descriptive names. i have gone through and removed the names accordingly. |
|
| 131022285 | The fairways and other features should not be named. Additionally, the hole number tag should just be a number like "12" |
|
| 116280847 | Ran across a "proposed" roadway where the source website doesn't exist anymore. I don't see any construction in imagery. Is there still intention for this way to be built? Or should the proposed roadway be cleaned up? |
|
| 132235135 | Is there still a driveway out to S. River Road?
|
|
| 132070676 | Private roads should still be mapped. The access tags should be restricted. Having private roads on the map is helpful for emergency responders. therefore, this changeset will be reverted and the correct tags will be added instead.
|
|
| 132185789 | Non-existent "demolished" roadways were also removed. |
|
| 119406835 | Wow, some of these buildings are way off. Ugh, RapID is a mess sometimes. Would you be able to clean some of the low quality outlines and additions up? |
|
| 131968293 | Building outlines look good. FYI, you can square buildings by pressing "q" on the keyboard. This will snap the angles to 90 degrees after putting the areas in. Keep up the good work! |
|
| 128542957 | What source did you use for the College Boulevard extension/new road? What is the timeline for this section to be constructed? |
|
| 124460248 | What source do you have for this new road? |
|
| 124902665 | What source do you have for the proposed Nardo Street? |
|
| 131781855 | There is not physical evidence everywhere. Who knows, it could have been an old road, or a power line, which would show up similarly. You can't prove any of it is correct as, again, there is no ground truth since nothing physical exists. And again, any feature without a physical, verififiable presence is not good practice and is out scope for OSM. And again, because this is being added for historical reasons, it should just be added to OHM, not OSM. |
|
| 131893295 | Ah, got it. Thanks for clarifying! |
|
| 131781228 | As mentioned in the other changesets in this area, This railway, specifically the section over by Toms River does not exist. It has not existed in a very long time and has no remnants remaining to meet the definition of "abandoned railway" in regards to the OSM wiki. Please do not map things that do not exist on OSM. If it is for historical purposes, please use the appropriate avenue, which would be OpenHistoricalMaps (OHM). Please remove the railway that does not exist. |