OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
132008137

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

132095585

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

132223399

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

132274544

Please use better changeset comments. What exactly did you do?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

132029327

Please map it how it is, and not how you need/want it for a game. This database is for legitimate uses and not video games.

132029327

Is there a reason you deleted all these golf course holes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132029327

130809901

Same thing here and for the rest of your edits. The Tee, Green, Fairway, etc. should not be named, especially if they are descriptive names. i have gone through and removed the names accordingly.

131022285

The fairways and other features should not be named. Additionally, the hole number tag should just be a number like "12"

116280847

Ran across a "proposed" roadway where the source website doesn't exist anymore. I don't see any construction in imagery. Is there still intention for this way to be built?

way/534221945

Or should the proposed roadway be cleaned up?

132235135

Is there still a driveway out to S. River Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132235135

132070676

Private roads should still be mapped. The access tags should be restricted. Having private roads on the map is helpful for emergency responders.

therefore, this changeset will be reverted and the correct tags will be added instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132070676

132185789

Non-existent "demolished" roadways were also removed.

119406835

Wow, some of these buildings are way off.

Ugh, RapID is a mess sometimes. Would you be able to clean some of the low quality outlines and additions up?

131968293

Building outlines look good. FYI, you can square buildings by pressing "q" on the keyboard. This will snap the angles to 90 degrees after putting the areas in.

Keep up the good work!

128542957

What source did you use for the College Boulevard extension/new road? What is the timeline for this section to be constructed?

124460248

What source do you have for this new road?

124902665

What source do you have for the proposed Nardo Street?

131781855

There is not physical evidence everywhere. Who knows, it could have been an old road, or a power line, which would show up similarly. You can't prove any of it is correct as, again, there is no ground truth since nothing physical exists.

And again, any feature without a physical, verififiable presence is not good practice and is out scope for OSM.

And again, because this is being added for historical reasons, it should just be added to OHM, not OSM.

131893295

Ah, got it. Thanks for clarifying!

131781228

As mentioned in the other changesets in this area,

This railway, specifically the section over by Toms River does not exist. It has not existed in a very long time and has no remnants remaining to meet the definition of "abandoned railway" in regards to the OSM wiki.

Please do not map things that do not exist on OSM. If it is for historical purposes, please use the appropriate avenue, which would be OpenHistoricalMaps (OHM).

Please remove the railway that does not exist.