So without going you know it is closed? Ok, sure, but yet you said you visited it originally.

So did you actually visit it in person?

What source was used?

You have done a lot of traveling to say you visited in person to verify. I find it unlikely given all your other travel "in person edits".

And if you found it in the news, which news source? And why would you verify in person if it was on the news? Just redundant.

which one from that webpage in particular?

Source? How do you know it is closed or has been for 3 years?

What do you mean you "fixed" them if you deleted most of the roads?

Can you elaborate?

Can you explain why you are just deleting the buildings instead of squaring them? There could be a lot details contained in the object, such as address or type, but instead, you just deleted it without adding a replacement with the details?

Can you elaborate? How is it a continuation if you deleted but never added to the map?

Be careful when moving things. A lot of it cokes down to the satellite imagery that is being used.

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/17661/aligning-roads-to-proper-location

Can you elaborate on what was done? Putting "xx" is not really appropriate for changeset comments and doesn't really help when trying to figure out what you did or why.

Can you elaborate on what was done? Putting "xx" is not really appropriate for changeset comments and doesn't really help when trying to figure out what you did or why.

If possible, please upload the changes before moving onto a new geographic area.

I actually find it hard to believe you have been down these roads. But whatever. Thanks for adjusting the road placement.

Pioneer Road does not appear to exist in the correct location on satellite imagery. It also does appears to connect to the roadway already there, and it was not added as such on OSM.

What satellite imagery are you using? I don't see any actual roads here.

You may be using an "approved" source, but this doesn't always mean it is correct. Satellite imagery should be used within the ID editor (or JOSM) as much as possible.

In this case, I recommend the edit be reverted and the roads that are actually present be mapped instead.

expanded abbreviations (Ex: St. > Street)

What source did you use to verify notes were correct and what do you mean you "fixed" them?

Just because there is a note saying what the note is, if it is from anonymous, it doesn't always mean it is correct. It should be verified as with any other edit.

What exactly do you mean "Cosmetic Changes"

You should not be mapping for a renderer, but instead for what it actually looks like.

Hello, and welcome to OSM! I see you're a new user here.

Can you elaborate more in the changesets on what was done? "Updates" is not useful and doesn't capture what was done. I see you deleting a lot of nodes, but that isn't exactly updates.

Please refer to the following webpage for better Changeset Comments:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello, and welcome to OSM! I see you're a new user here.

Can you elaborate more in the changesets on what was done? "Updates" is not useful and doesn't capture what was done. I see you deleting a lot of nodes, but that isn't exactly updates.

Please refer to the following webpage for better Changeset Comments:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments