Is "116 Bayard Street" the actual name?

Please provide a source for the name and update accordingly if that isn't the actual name.

I advise you to read up on the name wiki page:
name=*

Is the name really "705 Joyce Kilmer Avenue" or is that just the placeholder?

If you don't have an actual name, please leave it blank. Name is only a name and not an address.

Do you know if bridge is being rebuilt or repaired?

Please ensure you are using the correct tags for temporary closures if you so choose to map them:

osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

construction=*#:~:text=Don%27t%20use%20construction%3D*%20to%20tag%20such%20short%2Dterm%20closures%2C

Didn't know there was a grocery store chain named "Closed grocery"... must not be popular.

Fixed tag typo from "refd=" to "ref="

changeset/170807623

Are the roads under construction to be added? Or are they being removed? Or are they fenced off?

Sweet! Thank you! I wish iD made it easier for "advanced" editors to remove untagged lines that extend way beyond the zoom level.

Thanks for the message. Was up camping with no cell service.

Yes, that is indeed a mistake, but it should be removed. It was untagged line that I was trying to remove, and for some reason or another, I had to assign a tag, so I did bike path. The one segment you found must have gotten away.

I can remove later if you don't beat me to it.

Already added. Removing duplicate node.

Please don't use abbreviations in names. I updated for you:

way/1175719029

You can read more here:
osm.wiki/Names#:~:text=spelling%20and%20tagging.-,Abbreviation%20(do%20not),-Main%20article%3A

The fire station should still have its amenity=fire_station tag.

Building=* is not the same as amenity=*

Reviewed. Good edit!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169016218

I thought it was acceptable so long as they don't partially overlap. Overlapping is what screams OSMOSE/KeepRight issue flags.

You're correct, no errors on iD, but I will try take your feedback into account on the next golf course cleanup that screams for attention. Wasn't aware that it was incorrect. Would be a lot easier if the people originally mapping the golf courses would spend the time and care to do it correctly the first time, but I digress.

It happens. It's all endless links. If you see something like that where a coastline is tagged as node and is blatantly wrong - don't hesitate to correct.

Apologies I didn't respond earlier.

It looks like it was already reverted/fixed.
node/12953207946/history

It was not intentional - I thought it was a node for the islet that was duplicated from the area.

Instead of adding a new node, please just update the node that already exists. changeset reverted.

If you resolved the note, shouldn't it be marked as resolved too?

Is this secondary highway *still* under construction?

Is the entire road closed with no access to cars, pedestrian, etc? It is tagged as completely closed with a default access=no. Is that correct?