OpenStreetMap
CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 160044261 | proper capitalization should be used.
|
|
| 160408915 | What spurce did you use? |
|
| 160436939 | What source did you use? |
|
| 161222531 | What source did you use? |
|
| 160457944 | Is it a memorial or is more of an information board? |
|
| 161040534 | What source did you use for this info? |
|
| 160761884 | Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible. You can read more here:
|
|
| 160814129 | Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible. You can read more here:
|
|
| 160835916 | Changeset reverted. We use access tags to denote it is private access and not publicly accessible. You can read more here:
|
|
| 160736103 | Hello. You got rid of the building? That doesn't seem right. |
|
| 157060093 | What jhaluska80 said. It's very frowned upon to snap/connect landuse/landcover to roads. makes it a PITA to update. |
|
| 160804382 | Looks like some railway tags were left on an orchard relation line: |
|
| 160646674 | Changeset reverted. We use access=private to denote a road as private. |
|
| 113168728 | When adding business names, do not describe what they make in the name. Unless of course, it is their official name. I know, old changeset. But I'm just noticed it. :) |
|
| 160327226 | Good golf edit!
|
|
| 160327993 | Don't add tennis courts as buildings
|
|
| 160329662 | "Lollipopping" has been fixed. Use multi-polygon relations.
|
|
| 160328451 | Do not add tennis courts as buildings. This is not just a whiteboard for your golfing game. This is a real map we use. |
|
| 160330097 | Please don't lollipop ways. If something has a "hole" in it, then a multipolygon relation should be used.
|
|
| 160508471 | Welcome to OSM. Good edit.
|