CurlingMan13's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 151016983 | Access tags should be used instead where private ownership exists. this driveway is visible in aerial imagery. You can read why deletion is not the answer here: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property Changeset reverted in part or full. |
|
| 151017042 | Access tags should be used instead of deletion. osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
|
|
| 150948862 | Instead of spamming nodes, you should use landuse areas for woods.
|
|
| 147914877 | I encourage you to review the address added. You added addresses to random nodes on a house? Something is off. For example, some of the nodes on this house:
|
|
| 150861872 | Why did you delete all these features?
|
|
| 150849050 | I found the original changeset prior to this one and added a note to it.
|
|
| 150840266 | ah, doesn't matter. user was blocked: |
|
| 150840266 | Also, do not map features that do not exist.
|
|
| 150840266 | Do not partially overlap areas.
|
|
| 150861541 | Correction: Cleaned up golf course edits. |
|
| 150843171 | Do not map features as buildings when they are not! Ex: Tennis courts, pool. This is not the first time you have done this. I have referred your account to the DWG (Data Working Group) for further review in light of your recent block for similar issues. |
|
| 150853300 | Do not partially overlap areas. BEFORE MAKING FURTHER EDITS, PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING: leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
|
|
| 150853997 | Changeset reverted in part or full.
|
|
| 150853997 | Do not partially overlap areas.
|
|
| 150817445 | Instead of adding a node for Taco Bell with a note, you could just add it. lol |
|
| 149712721 | The names still need to be removed from all the houses, but the changesets beyond that tiny error look fantastic! |
|
| 150773873 | Please use more detailed changesets. What did you change, and why? "tpc" tells me nothing.
|
|
| 137453932 | Apologies, after more research, the relation was located. It looks like that relation was modified about 2 months ago to remove landuse=military. That relation change (not your changeset) will need to be reverted. Thanks for the response! |
|
| 147588063 | Why did you remove landuse=military? |
|
| 137453932 | Is there a particular reason you straight up deleted the military landuse area for Offutt AFB? |