Please do not overlap landcovers. I have cleaned it up for this golf course. I highly recommend you review common golf mapping pitfalls here:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145015929

'Changeset has been reverted. Do not delete features just because they are "private". You can read more on why here:

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

changeset/145020680

What source did you use to change the name of the street? "Memes Street" sounds mighty sus.

So realistically, it ahould be tagged as "Under Cobstruction" instead, not proposed?

Please use a more detailed changeset comment than "yes". This doesn't tell me anything. You can read more about changeset comments and advice for better comments here:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144708166

Note to others. This user created an alt account.

@Chris%20Denomy

I am pretty sure I have cautioned you for this before, but do not create "lollipop" areas. Multirelation polygons should be used instead. I have corrected it here.

Please read:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

What's up with not connecting this cartpath segment to the other ones on either end, even though they are right next to each other?

I have gone through and correct this for you.

If the cartpath has a bridge over water, please map it as a bridge, not just a water ford. I have corrected this for you in this instance.

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

'Changeset(s) have been reverted. As made evident in discussion on changeset/144781857, this was mapped for personal reasons. Despite that discussion, the user made further edits to this non-existing POI and generated notes.

Non-existing features should not mapped. Mapping things solely for your personal bookmark is not permitted on OSM, and as such, the node has been removed.'

changeset/144804583

Also, what's with the lack of cartpath bridges?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144590886

I'm pretty sure I have left comments for this before:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

Do not overlap areas. The fairways and greens are a mess with many overlaps. I have gone through and corrected it again here, but please be more careful in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144590886

These water areas do not exist. Do not map things that do not exist.

You should use multipolygon relations for this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144521155

Overlapping areas is not permitted. Please review to avoid common mapping pitfalls:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

I have updated this for you.