I know, but at least you do it right and add useful things to the map, and do so correctly, unlike some people. *cough cough* ...Who are still being cleaned up after.

These are some good imports! Even doing building parts! Man, if only you could get the same data and do this type of import around Atlanta to replace a bunch of other sub-par imports! :D

Looks like they all need some love here.

Will you be addressing the bad buildings here, such as:
way/787696414

Please use multipolygons to map areas with an "island" in the middle.
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Additionally, please do not use descriptive names to describe a feature.

I'm not going to go through and list every single one...

way/967154977
way/967154193
way/967154845
way/967154204
way/967154832
way/250757730
way/967154267

It's suffice to say, these were not manually reviewed...

Please use a more changeset comment. What did you change, and why?

Reverted in:
changeset/133347075

What source did you use to 1) know this was going to be built, and 2) know the alignment of the roadway?

What source did you use to add these non-existent railways? There is no evidence on the ground of some of these railways that do not meet the definition of "abandonded". Please do not add items that have no trace or remnants on the ground. There are no ties, rails, signals, etc., and instead it was largely overbuilt and replaced by buildings, roadways and other features. These should be removed from OSM since they no longer exist, but should be added to OHM instead. Adding items for "historical" purposes isn't permitted on OSM, and I know we have had this discussion before about you adding non-existent items, and continuing to add them back.

Where did you get the start dates for these items? They definitely wouldn't appear on an elevation map.

Additionally, I suspect this was an import, but I digress on this point for now.

These aren't even buildings... These are just random nodes.

Please add info to your changeset features. What did you add, and why?

"." Doesn't tell me anything about what you changed, why or any source that may have been used to trace the history of various things on the map.

Thanks!

Please do not add descriptive names to the map when they aren't the real name of the item, or anything beyond just a description of the feature.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change, and why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133312201

It is an open source project that has rules that need to be followed. Using good changeset comments is one of them, as well as only mapping things that exist, and mapping them correctly.

Continuing to not follow rules and guidelines will have consequences.

Please use "access=private" tags instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133194607

What does "bs" mean?

STOP.

Please add better changeset comments. Read this for more info:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

STOP!

READ THIS BEFORE CONTINUING!
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.

As mentioned in previous changesets, please use more details than just "bs". What did you change, and why?

Good changeset comments are very important for contrbuting to OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133277274

Do not map a duplicate water area over a correctly mapped onnjsut for your game.