They did some other vandalism. I recommend referral to DWG

tests are not permitted on OSM.

changeset reverted

this isn't a golf course...

changeset reverted in part or full
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152050465

Read:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Changeset reverted in part or full. Access tags should be used instead.

changeset/152051586

Welcome to OSM and edit looks acceptable.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152047745

I think I fixed it whenI left the comment - otherwise I forget and the errors remain.

If it isn't fixed yet (and they make this error on future Changesets), it should just be reverted.

Please do not delete features just to readd them with slightly different positions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151872950

Descriptive names such as "Not Public Road" should not be used.

Awesome. Keep up the good work! I've been trying to get these cart paths converted from roads to paths ever so slowly.

Do not partially overlap areas. Before making further edits please review:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Overlapping%20green/fairway/rough%20polygons%20(see%20graphic%20below).

I have fixed it for you for just this changeset. Please try to avoid this in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151728080

Same thing here:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

I fixed it for you here as well

Please review:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

Before making further edits to golf courses, please review the following webpage for common pitfalls to avoid:

leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.

In this case, do not fold an area back upon itself with a small gap to simulate a hole. Multipolygon relations should be used instead.

Please use more detailed changeset comments. What did you change and why?

You can read more about changeset comments and their importance here:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151696186

changeset reverted in part or full.

Blank node tags.

Do not wrap polygon areas around a hole and leave a tiny open gap.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151680872

Do not connect areas using small slivers. I have commented on previous changesets for exactly this, but yet, you continue to do this. Please 1) Stop doing this, and 2) Respond to Changeset comments.

You have not messaged or responded to changeset comments, and I have no choice but to refer this to the DWG for further action.

Please review the following page:
leisure=golf_course#:~:text=Wrapping%20polygon%20areas%20around%20a%20hole%20and%20leaving%20a%20tiny%20open%20gap.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151682449

Do not simulate holes by folding an area back upon itself leaving a little sliver. Multipolygon relations should be used instead.

I cleaned it up for you.

Why did you delete everything?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151557329